But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Mary Peltola

Democrat · U.S. Senate, Alaska
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 4 tracked votes

Asked to complete the sentence "U.S. military aid to Israel should be", Peltola answered in Alaska's 2026 voter guide: "Used to maintain peace in the region and to end further civilian harm in the region at large." In a 2024 House debate she urged continued humanitarian relief in Gaza.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Peltola is a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate in Alaska and served just over a term in the U.S. House, where she co-chaired the moderate Blue Dog caucus.

When she entered this race, Jewish Insider summarised that House record as strongly pro-Israel: she "supported a standalone Israel aid package opposed by many Democrats, as well as a measure to override the Biden administration's hold on U.S. arms sales to Israel that only a handful of other Democrats voted for." The same piece records her backing measures against Iran and its proxies, sanctions on the International Criminal Court, and several antisemitism measures, and her vote against censuring a colleague. Her recorded votes on this site's tracked bills run in that direction, with one exception, and they are on this card with their own sources. Two of them are worth grounding. In April 2024 she voted for a $26.38 billion package for the government of Israel, of which $4 billion was for the Iron Dome and David's Sling interceptor systems and $1.2 billion for Iron Beam, all of them systems for shooting things down. Four weeks later she voted for the bill written to force delivery of the 2,000-pound and 500-pound bombs the administration had paused, which is a different kind of weapon and a different act.

On the other question, what the United States sends Palestinians, the one answer of hers we could open is from a televised debate in October 2024. Asked about Israel, she said: "The conflict in Palestine and, uh, in Gaza is terrible. It's a real humanitarian crisis. And as a mother of seven, as a grandmother of two, of course, I want peace and prosperity everywhere. I think that it's really important that we continue to provide humanitarian relief wherever we can. We need to make sure people are getting adequate amounts of food and water, and that we are preventing as many youth, um, civilians from being killed as possible." The outlet that transcribed it, Must Read Alaska, headlined the answer as a refusal to affirm Israel's right to exist. That is the outlet's reading of what she did not say; her words are above, and readers can weigh both.

Her campaign site is about affordability and anti-corruption measures, and carries nothing on this subject. The 2026 primary voter guide that Alaska Public Media built with KTOO, the Alaska Beacon and the Anchorage Daily News asked every Senate candidate to complete the sentence "U.S. military aid to Israel should be". She answered in the guide, before the August 18 primary: "Used to maintain peace in the region and to end further civilian harm in the region at large." In August 2026 her campaign did not answer Jewish Insider's repeated questions about whether her stance had changed since she left the House; the outlet reported that Israel has rarely come up in the race.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 4 tracked votes

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 4 tracked votes.)

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-13) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“The conflict in Palestine and, uh, in Gaza is terrible. It's a real humanitarian crisis. And as a mother of seven, as a grandmother of two, of course, I want peace and prosperity everywhere. I think that it's really important that we continue to provide humanitarian relief wherever we can. We need to make sure people are getting adequate amounts of food and water, and that we are preventing as many youth, um, civilians from being killed as possible.”
Source ↗, 2024-10-10
“Used to maintain peace in the region and to end further civilian harm in the region at large.”
Source ↗, 2026-09-26

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, read 2026-09-26] Her answer in the 2026 Alaska primary voter guide, built by Alaska Public Media with KTOO, the Alaska Beacon and the Anchorage Daily News. Asked to complete the sentence "U.S. military aid to Israel should be ____" in 5 to 20 words, she wrote: "Used to maintain peace in the region and to end further civilian harm in the region at large." She answered every other item on the form. The guide carries no publication date of its own, so the entry is dated to the day it was read; the questionnaire was put to the candidates ahead of the August 18, 2026 primary.
  • [Position, 2026-08-21] Jewish Insider reported: "Peltola’s campaign did not provide comment in response to repeated inquiries from Jewish Insider about whether her stance has changed since leaving the House." The same piece says "the issue of Israel has rarely come up in the campaign." A third-party report, attributed.
  • [Position, 2026-01-12] Jewish Insider, reporting her Senate campaign launch: she "maintained a strongly pro-Israel voting record, breaking on numerous occasions with a majority of her party to vote for measures supporting the Jewish state", and she "supported a standalone Israel aid package opposed by many Democrats, as well as a measure to override the Biden administration's hold on U.S. arms sales to Israel that only a handful of other Democrats voted for." Opened and confirmed word for word. These are the outlet's words characterising her record, not hers.
  • Her recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card with their own roll-call sources. They run one way with a single exception, and this record's own summary says that exception was about Internal Revenue Service funding cuts attached to the bill rather than about the aid. That reason is asserted nowhere else and carries no source, so it is recorded here and not on the card.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-11] With two other Blue Dog co-chairs she called for freezing $6 billion in Iranian assets so the money could not reach groups attacking Israel. A joint statement, so it supports only joint wording. Not on the card summary.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Position, 2024-10-10] In the KTUU and Alaska Public Media televised debate she said it is "really important that we continue to provide humanitarian relief wherever we can" and that "we need to make sure people are getting adequate amounts of food and water". Recovered word for word from Must Read Alaska's transcript of the answer, published the following day. She names no United States programme and no figure.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2024-10-10] The same answer opens: "The conflict in Palestine and, uh, in Gaza is terrible. It's a real humanitarian crisis." The outlet's headline reads the answer as a refusal to affirm Israel's right to exist, and notes she did not use the word Israel. That is the writer's inference from a silence; the card carries her words and names the outlet's reading rather than adopting it.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-09] Alaska Public Media's round-up of Alaska leaders' statements, reprinted by Senator Murkowski's office, carries her statement calling the attacks appalling. Not on the card summary.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-11] The Blue Dog joint statement describes the attack as the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust. Joint wording. Not on the card summary.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Covered by the items above.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • [Position, 2026-01-12] Jewish Insider's piece records her support for the Antisemitism Awareness Act, a resolution describing anti-Zionism as antisemitic, and a resolution on university presidents' testimony, and her vote against censuring Rep. Rashida Tlaib. Context, not an answer on what the United States sends.

Race and status context

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Dan Sullivan (Republican)
  2. ✗ Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. (Republican)
  3. ✗ Gerald L. Heikes (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.