But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Andrew Sneed

–

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

Nothing located has Sneed taking a position on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. His platform is domestic (healthcare, affordability, labor and congressional reform), and his reform planks stop at lobbying rules that name no country or cause.

✉ Email the campaign Website ↗X ↗Facebook ↗

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Sneed is the Democratic nominee in Alabama’s 5th District, a Huntsville small-business owner who won the June 2026 primary runoff and faces the sitting member.

His own material was read: his campaign’s platform page runs through healthcare, affordability, labor, immigration and congressional reform: term limits, a stock-trading ban, lobbying moratoriums. Israel, Gaza and foreign policy appear nowhere in it, and no interview or statement of his was located that reaches these questions. His reform rhetoric about lobbying is general and names no organization or country, and this card does not convert it into a position on any lobby.

You are better placed to get an answer than we are. Ask Sneed directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in his own words.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track

Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.

Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

Nothing located.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

Nothing located.

Characterization of the conflict

Nothing located.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

Nothing located that reaches this project’s subject. His congressional-reform planks (term limits, stock-trading ban, lobbying moratoriums), per his platform and his campaign’s trust-gap piece, are general and name no organization; they are not written up as positions on any lobby.
No tracked funding badge appears because no committee support is recorded for him.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

Nothing located.

Where the absence was checked

[Consulted, read 2026-08-21] His platform page: domestic planks. No occurrence of Israel, Gaza, Palestine, antisemitism or foreign policy. We checked the campaign’s own site.
[Consulted] His Ballotpedia profile and Alabama Political Reporter’s runoff-result coverage. Race facts only.
A prediction-market profile page was offered by the research; not a source of his words, nothing claimed. One further address was offered on localcandidates.org, a host this project does not cite.

Race and status context

Democratic nominee via the June 16, 2026 runoff, facing the sitting member, whose card carries its own record. He has held no federal office, so there are no recorded votes on this card.

Also in this race

✗ Dale Strong (Republican)

All Alabama candidates.