But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Nikema Williams

Democrat · U.S. House, Georgia District 5
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 6 tracked votes

Williams led a call for humanitarian aid to Gaza. On weapons she has said she supports Israel's right to self-defense while opposing splitting aid packages. No position located on conditioning transfers.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Williams represents Georgia's 5th District in Atlanta and is running for re-election.

Her located record runs through the humanitarian side. She led a call for humanitarian aid to Gaza and in May 2025 co-led a letter to the Israeli ambassador demanding transparency about reports of Israel taking control of aid entry into Gaza; that letter also condemned Hamas's October 7 attack and its use of civilians as shields, and said Hamas cannot remain in control of Gaza.

On weapons themselves, her February 2024 statement reaffirmed Israel's right to self-defence while opposing Republican efforts to split aid packages, arguing that assistance for Israel, humanitarian aid and national security should not be politicized.

The research also turned up that in April 2026 she announced blocking specific offensive transfers, naming 1,000-pound unguided bombs and military bulldozers. **That claim appears to belong to a United States senator, not to her**, and the research page sets out why. It is not on this card.

Her recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges here; no statement from her about an individual vote was located.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 6 tracked votes

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to send more support
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in exactly half of their recorded tracked votes. The tie is broken by money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track and an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$24K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $22,900 · DMFI: $1,392
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$22,900The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.DMFI PAC$1,392Democratic Majority for Israel's PAC; calls itself the home for pro-Israel Democrats and backs Democratic candidates who support a strong U.S. alliance with the government of Israel.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2024-02-06] Statement reaffirming support for Israel's right to self-defence while opposing Republican efforts to separate aid packages, arguing assistance for Israel, humanitarian aid and national security should not be politicized (her statement on rejecting the Republican funding package and on legislation failing humanitarian obligations). Not opened.
  • ⚠⚠ **A CLAIM THAT APPEARS TO BE ANOTHER LEGISLATOR'S.** The research turned up: "On April 15, 2026, Williams publicly announced her decision to block specific U.S. offensive military transfers to Israel, specifically 1,000-pound unguided bombs and military bulldozers," assessing offensive aid case by case while maintaining support for Iron Dome. **The source it supplied is a Facebook post by Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan**, whose own web address reads "today i voted to block the provision of us military assistance to israel 1000 po[und]...". That is a senator's account of her own vote. **Williams is a member of the House and could not have cast a vote on a Senate joint resolution of disapproval.** None of her own posts in the sources found mentions bombs or bulldozers. The post is login-walled (1.5KB shell), so it could not be read directly, but the web address alone establishes whose statement it is. **Withheld from the card entirely.**
  • Her recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card. No statement from her about any individual vote was located.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Position, undated] "Congresswoman Nikema Williams Leads Call for Humanitarian Aid to Gaza", her own House page. Not opened; the title itself is the claim the card makes.
  • [Position, 2025-05-08] Co-led a letter to Israeli Ambassador Yechiel Leiter demanding transparency about reports of Israel taking control over humanitarian aid entry into Gaza, which also condemned Hamas's October 7 actions and its use of civilians as human shields and said Hamas cannot remain in control of Gaza, as reported.
  • [Position, 2025-08-15] At an Atlanta town hall she described Gaza as an "ongoing conflict" and emphasized her work to get humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians (Atlanta Civic Circle). Not opened.

Characterization of the conflict

Related rhetoric and lobbying

Safety and antisemitism (context)

Also in this race

  1. – John Salvesen (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.