But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Dave Dawson

–

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

Nothing located has Dawson taking a position on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. At a 2026 primary forum he was among candidates reported as refusing donations from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and corporate PACs.

✉ Email the campaign Website ↗Facebook ↗

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Dawson is the Democratic nominee in Iowa’s 4th District, a prosecutor and former state representative who won the June 2026 primary.

His one located act in this territory is about money: at a March 2026 candidate forum in Orange City, local radio reported that he and both primary rivals said they were "not accepting AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) or corporate PAC donations", the outlet’s summary of what each said, carried as reported. It names the organization, so it is carried as a named-lobby money position; it says nothing about aid or weapons, and this card does not stretch it.

Nothing located has him addressing U.S. military aid, the conflict, or antisemitism. Ask Dawson directly and send us the reply: it goes on this page in his own words.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track

Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.

Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

Nothing located.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

Nothing located.

Characterization of the conflict

Nothing located.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

[Position, 2026-03-24, reported] Sioux County Radio’s forum report, verified: all three Democratic candidates said they were not accepting AIPAC or corporate PAC donations. The outlet’s summary of spoken remarks; no direct quote of his exists, and none is invented. A named-lobby money position, reported rather than confirmed directly.
No tracked funding badge appears because no committee support is recorded for him.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

Nothing located.

Where the absence was checked

[Consulted] His Ballotpedia profile and Wikipedia entry; race and career facts. No campaign-site address was located in the research record.

Race and status context

Democratic nominee in a heavily Republican open district; his Republican opponent’s card carries its own record. His state-house votes are outside what this site tracks.

Also in this race

– Chris McGowan (Republican)

All Iowa candidates.