But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Dillan Vancil

Republican · U.S. House, Illinois District 17
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: He names Israel in rejecting "blank checks", which limits the aid without saying it should end or continue, so it reads as a limits statement alone. Reviewed by hand on 2026-09-28. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Vancil told a February 2026 questionnaire: "The United States should not be writing blank checks for Ukraine or Israel, especially when our own border is insecure, our debt is exploding, and families here are struggling with the cost of living."

✉  Copy a message to send them

The only address on file for this campaign is its compliance or filing contact, which will not answer a policy question. Copy this message and send it through their website or a public social account.

If you send this from your own email, cc replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org so we can post their answer.

Website ↗X ↗Facebook ↗

Deep Dive

Vancil is the Republican candidate for Illinois's 17th District, running against Rep. Eric Sorensen.

Asked about U.S. intervention in Ukraine, Israel and Venezuela, he answered: "The United States should not be writing blank checks for Ukraine or Israel, especially when our own border is insecure, our debt is exploding, and families here are struggling with the cost of living."

That is the whole of it. He names no package, sets no condition, does not distinguish defensive from offensive transfers, and has published nothing located on U.S. aid to Palestinians. He has no federal voting record.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“The United States should not be writing blank checks for Ukraine or Israel, especially when our own border is insecure, our debt is exploding, and families here are struggling with the cost of living.”
Source ↗, 2026-02-18

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2026-02-18] Shaw Local 2026 election questionnaire, opened and confirmed word for word, read beneath its own question ("What is your position on U.S. intervention, specifically Ukraine, Israel and Venezuela?"): "The United States should not be writing blank checks for Ukraine or Israel, especially when our own border is insecure, our debt is exploding, and families here are struggling with the cost of living. In the case of Venezuela, any limited action must be tightly focused on protecting core American interests in our own hemisphere, not on nation-building or open-ended commitments."
  • The objection covers Ukraine and Israel together, on domestic-priority grounds. No specific package, condition, or distinction between defensive and offensive transfers is stated, so the card gives it as blanket.
  • He has no federal voting record.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • No statement or documented position found by the research.

Characterization of the conflict

  • Nothing located about the conflict itself.
  • [Position, 2026-02-18] Same questionnaire, on war powers, confirmed verbatim: "In a dangerous world, the President must have the constitutional authority to order limited military strikes and, in certain cases, detain a hostile foreign head of state without waiting for Congress, so long as those actions are tied directly to defending American lives or vital interests." Recorded because it bears on how U.S. force is authorized, though it is not about what the U.S. sends into this conflict.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing located.

Consulted

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Eric Sorensen (Democrat)

All Illinois candidates.

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.