But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Lupe Castillo

Republican · U.S. House, Illinois District 4
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: In an August 2026 candidate-survey answer she says "Israel should be allowed to protect themselves" and, of Palestine, "we should send them food and medical supplies for the people", which points both ways. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Castillo's candidate survey answer says: "Israel should be allowed to protect themselves they were attacked for no reason," and "As for Palestine we should send them food and medical supplies for the people. Unfortunately, Hamas is hiding within these people." No position located on military aid packages.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Castillo is the Republican candidate for Illinois's 4th District.

Her position is in her own words in a Ballotpedia candidate survey, read in full. Answering what public policy she is passionate about, she wrote: "Foreign policies and wars, we must support those that have been attacked for no sensible reason. NATO needs to do their part in supporting Ukraine." She continued: "Israel should be allowed to protect themselves they were attacked for no reason, just for the fact they are Israel. As for Palestine we should send them food and medical supplies for the people. Unfortunately, Hamas is hiding within these people."

That is a statement about what the United States should send in each direction: support for Israel's right to act, and food and medical supplies for Palestinians. What it does not address is any specific package, transfer or condition, and the research found no statement from her on those.

The research also turns up her describing the U.S. relationship with Israel as covering "health care, energy and pharmaceuticals" and noting its role as a long-standing regional ally. She has no federal voting record.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“As for Palestine we should send them food and medical supplies for the people. Unfortunately, Hamas is hiding within these people.”
Source ↗, 2026-08-12
“Israel should be allowed to protect themselves they were attacked for no reason, just for the fact they are Israel.”
Source ↗, 2026-08-12

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, published 2026-08-12] Her own Ballotpedia candidate survey, opened and confirmed word for word, read in sequence beneath its own question heading ("What areas of public policy are you personally passionate about?") so attribution is to her rather than to an adjacent candidate: "Foreign policies and wars, we must support those that have been attacked for no sensible reason. NATO needs to do their part in supporting Ukraine." Then: "Israel should be allowed to protect themselves they were attacked for no reason, just for the fact they are Israel." A live published page, so banded position under the read-date rule.
  • The research also turns up her describing "a good relation with Israel that includes health care, energy and pharmaceuticals" and Israel's strategic role as a long-time regional ally, from an iVoterGuide profile. Not separately opened.
  • No statement located on U.S. military aid packages, specific weapons transfers, or conditions.
  • She has no federal voting record.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Position, published 2026-08-12] Same survey, confirmed verbatim: "As for Palestine we should send them food and medical supplies for the people. Unfortunately, Hamas is hiding within these people." An affirmative statement about U.S. supplies to Palestinians, which is why it is on the card, with the recipient named.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, published 2026-08-12] The same passage carries her characterization: Israel "attacked for no reason," and Hamas "hiding within" the Palestinian population.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Nothing located.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing located.

Consulted

  • Ballotpedia's 2024 IL-04 election page. ⚠ Her Ballotpedia profile page also carries district coverage naming other candidates including Patty Garcia, who has her own card on this site; her survey answers were read under their own question headings to keep attribution clean.

Also in this race

  1. ✓ Patty Garcia (Democrat)
  2. – Chris Getty (Independent)
  3. – Ed Hershey (Other)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.