But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Sean Casten
Casten wrote the Ceasefire Compliance Act, which would ban U.S.-origin weapons in Gaza and the West Bank if Israel breaks the October 2025 ceasefire, annexes the West Bank or fails to curb settler violence, while exempting air defenses including Iron Dome, David's Sling and Arrow 3.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
You asked Sean Casten where they stand.
Deep Dive
Casten represents Illinois's 6th District in Chicago's western suburbs and is running for re-election.
He introduced the Ceasefire Compliance Act in February 2026. In his own words: "As one of the United States' most important allies, Israel must ensure that its policies and the use of U.S. military assistance align with American values, interests, and the law. That starts with requiring compliance with the October 10, 2025, ceasefire agreement and the steps laid out in the 20-point plan, curbing settler violence, and rejecting annexation in the West Bank." The bill sets up end-use monitoring and congressional oversight, and states plainly that it "does not limit funds for air defense systems, including Iron Dome, David's Sling, and Arrow 3."
His pairing of the two directions is older than the bill. In February 2024 he explained voting against an Israel aid bill this way: "The bill voted on by the House this week fails to provide a single penny of humanitarian aid; that failure makes it inhumane to Palestinians and reduces the long-term security of Israelis." In the same statement: "I stand ready to support serious efforts to assist Israel in its absolute right to defend itself. This legislation is not that."
In August 2025 he opposed a full military occupation of Gaza as "a path to further bloodshed and suffering for innocent Palestinian civilians."
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 6 tracked votes
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in some, but no more than half, of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 6 tracked votes.)
The money
$39K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
In their words
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- [Position, 2026-02-23] Introduced the Ceasefire Compliance Act, opened and confirmed word for word. The bill "would ban the use of US-origin weapons in Gaza and the West Bank if Israel violates the October 10, 2025, ceasefire agreement and 20-point plan, annexes the West Bank, or fails to combat settler violence against Palestinians," creating "an end-use monitoring group and congressional oversight mechanisms to enforce this ban while exempting defensive" systems. Explicitly: "Does not limit funds for air defense systems, including Iron Dome, David's Sling, and Arrow 3." His own statement: "As one of the United States' most important allies, Israel must ensure that its policies and the use of U.S. military assistance align with American values, interests, and the law. That starts with requiring compliance with the October 10, 2025, ceasefire agreement and the steps laid out in the 20-point plan, curbing settler violence, and rejecting annexation in the West Bank."
⚠ **Multi-speaker release:** it also quotes J Street president Jeremy Ben-Ami and New Jewish Narrative's Madeleine Cereghino at length. Neither is used or attributed to Casten anywhere in this package.
- [Position, 2024-02-06] Statement on the Israel security supplemental, confirmed verbatim: "The United States has a duty to provide aid to our allies in their times of need. That includes Israel, and I stand ready to support serious efforts to assist Israel in its absolute right to defend itself. This legislation is not that." And: "The bill voted on by the House this week fails to provide a single penny of humanitarian aid; that failure makes it inhumane to Palestinians and reduces the long-term security of Israelis. That is incompatible with a two-state solution and cannot be seriously considered." He also faults the Speaker for having "twice used aid to Israel as a political pawn," once to cut IRS funding.
- [Position, April 2024] Voiced support for replenishing Israel's defensive systems against attacks from Hamas and Iran, as reported; source not separately opened.
- His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card. The February 2024 statement is his own explanation of the pattern: he supports defensive aid and opposed packages carrying no humanitarian assistance.
- An advocacy watchlist entry (Bought by Zionism) was consulted; advocacy sources never carry a card.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- [Position, 2024-02-06] The same statement is his clearest on this direction: U.S. security assistance to Israel must be paired with humanitarian aid to Gaza, and a package with none of it is "inhumane to Palestinians."
- [Position, 2025-10-10] Statement on the Gaza peace deal: welcomed the ceasefire and hostage release, said Hamas must be demilitarized and removed from power, and called for a massive surge of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Not opened.
Characterization of the conflict
- [Position, 2025-08-08] Statement on Netanyahu's occupation plan: an occupation would be "a path to further bloodshed and suffering for innocent Palestinian civilians" and would "deepen the already catastrophic humanitarian crisis." Not opened.
- [Position, 2025-10-10] Called the October 7 attack a "brutal terrorist attack" in the peace-deal statement.
- [Position, 2026-02-23] Frames his aim as security for Israelis alongside freedom, self-determination and statehood for Palestinians.
- [Position, 2025-12-09] Arab News interview; not opened.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
- [Position, February 2024] Took part in a congressional delegation to Israel and the West Bank organized by the J Street Education Fund, following a similar 2019 trip (Washington Examiner op-ed post, login-walled).
- [2026-02-13] A constituent letter published in Patch criticizing his office's responsiveness to Palestinian constituents. A constituent's view, not his position; recorded as consulted.
- A CBS Chicago post reporting an exchange with a protester; login-walled, unverified.
Safety and antisemitism (context)
- [Position, 2024-05-01] Statement on H.R. 6090: concern at rising antisemitic hate crimes, alongside his objections to codifying the IHRA definition. Not opened.
Also in this race
- ?Mixed Niki Conforti (Republican)
All Illinois candidates.
See everyone on the Illinois ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.