But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Drew Cox

Democrat · U.S. House, Indiana District 4
✓From their own words
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. In their own words on September 3, 2026.

Cox pledges to pull aid: he is “committed to pulling military aid from all nations committing violent acts, particularly the genocide in Gaza”. On Ballotpedia his campaign goes further: “not a single cent, or a single weapon”, offensive or defensive, should go from the United States to Israel.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Cox is the Democratic nominee in Indiana’s 4th District, a Marine Corps veteran and Purdue music instructor who won the May 2026 primary.

His own platform, rendered from his campaign site, states under "Humane foreign policy" that he "is strongly opposed to the current state of United States foreign policy, specifically regarding involvements in Gaza and the Middle East" and "is committed to pulling military aid from all nations committing violent acts, particularly the genocide in Gaza", his platform’s own words, including its characterization of the war.

His campaign’s statement on Ballotpedia goes further, under the heading “End the Genocide in Gaza and fight AIPAC”: not a single cent or weapon, offensive or defensive, should go from the United States to Israel, and “The United States should stop protecting Israel in the UN and shielding Israel and its leaders from international justice.” It adds that he refuses money from AIPAC.

Nothing located has him addressing U.S. humanitarian aid for Palestinians as a funding question.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
✓ Endorsed by Track AIPAC
Track AIPACA watchdog on AIPAC-linked money. It backs candidates who reject AIPAC support and call for an arms embargo and conditions on aid to the government of Israel.These endorsements come from groups that push to restrict or end U.S. weapons transfers to the government of Israel. Endorsements from these groups are shown for information; they do not decide the mark.

In their words

“committed to pulling military aid from all nations committing violent acts, particularly the genocide in Gaza”
Source ↗, 2026-08-21
“not a single cent, or a single weapon, whether offensive or “defensive”, should be sent from the United States to Israel.”
Source ↗, 2026-09-03
Endorsements

Track AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, read 2026-08-21] His platform: the pulling-military-aid pledge and the Gaza-genocide characterization, verified verbatim. A live page, recorded on the date we read it.
  • [Position, read 2026-09-03] His campaign’s statement on Ballotpedia, under “End the Genocide in Gaza and fight AIPAC”: “not a single cent, or a single weapon, whether offensive or “defensive”, should be sent from the United States to Israel. The United States should stop protecting Israel in the UN and shielding Israel and its leaders from international justice.” Verified verbatim on the page and read by a volunteer; campaign copy carried by Ballotpedia, so his campaign’s own words. It states that the position extends to defensive weapons.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located as a funding question.

Characterization of the conflict

  • His platform’s "genocide in Gaza" characterization, verified above and quoted on the card as his platform’s own words.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Nothing located. No tracked funding badge appears because no committee support is recorded for him.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing located.

Where the record was checked

Race and status context

  • Democratic nominee facing the sitting member, whose card carries its own record. He has held no office, so there are no recorded votes on this card.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Jim Baird (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.