But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Jack Bergman
- Backed with $28K by PACs we track that support U.S. weapons funding for the government of Israel (lifetime)
- Endorsed by AIPAC
- Sits on House Armed Services
Bergman led a bipartisan resolution in May 2025 urging more U.S. investment in Israel’s missile defense, cyber and intelligence sharing, and that Israel keep its qualitative military edge. He said it "makes clear that Israel’s security is America’s security".
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
You asked Jack Bergman where they stand.
Deep Dive
Bergman represents Michigan’s 1st District, covering the Upper Peninsula and the north of the Lower Peninsula. He is a retired Marine Corps lieutenant general and is running for re-election.
His clearest act on this question is legislative. On May 14, 2025 he introduced a resolution, H.Res. 411, with Representatives Don Davis, Jared Golden and Craig Goldman, calling for expanded U.S. and Israeli defense cooperation. It cites joint work on the Iron Dome, David’s Sling and Arrow missile defense systems, and calls for artificial intelligence and cybersecurity to be priorities when the U.S. and Israel renegotiate their Memorandum of Understanding. If adopted it would endorse further U.S. investment in joint defense projects and state that Israel should keep its qualitative military edge. His own words: "Our partnership with Israel is rooted in trust, strength, and shared national security interests."
In March 2026, after joint U.S. and Israeli operations against Iranian targets, he issued a statement on deterrence: "Peace comes through strength, and weakness only emboldens our enemies." That is a position on U.S. military action, not on what the United States sends to Israel, and it is on the research page as such.
His October 2023 statements fall inside the months after October 7, 2023 and are on the research page rather than the card. His recorded votes on the tracked bills and his funding from pro-Israel committees are shown separately on this card.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes
House Committee on Armed Services
• His campaign issues page, read in full on this date, sets out nine issue sections: broadband infrastructure, veterans, Michigan agriculture, protecting life, national security, education, immigration, natural resources and the opioid epidemic. None of them mentions Israel, Gaza, U.S. military aid or foreign assistance of any kind; the national-security section is about when and how U.S. troops are deployed and equipped.
• Led and introduced H.Res. 411, a bipartisan resolution calling for expanded U.S. defense cooperation with the government of Israel, announced on his official House site; the text as he filed it urges the U.S. government to ensure the government of Israel keeps its qualitative military edge, supports additional U.S. investment in missile defense, cybersecurity and intelligence-sharing with Israel, and sets emerging technologies as a priority for the United States in renegotiating the U.S.-Israel Memorandum of Understanding.
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)
The money
$28K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
In their words
AIPAC (2026 endorsement)
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- 2025-05-14 [Current position; VERIFIED]: Introduced H.Res. 411 with Reps. Don Davis (NC-01), Jared Golden (ME-02) and Craig Goldman (TX-12), a resolution calling for expanded U.S. and Israeli defense cooperation. It cites joint work on the Iron Dome, David’s Sling and Arrow missile defense systems and recent joint work on counter-unmanned aircraft and anti-tunneling technology through the Irregular Warfare Support Directorate. It calls for artificial intelligence and cybersecurity to be prioritized in the renegotiation of the U.S.-Israel Memorandum of Understanding. If adopted it would reaffirm congressional support for Israel’s right to self-defense, endorse further investment in bilateral defense initiatives, and ensure Israel retains its qualitative military edge. He said: "Our partnership with Israel is rooted in trust, strength, and shared national security interests," and that the resolution "makes clear that Israel’s security is America’s security." The middle of that statement, on doubling down on defense innovation and intelligence sharing as threats grow more complex, is already carried verbatim in the record’s existing quote for this candidate.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- Nothing located. No statement on UNRWA, Gaza humanitarian funding or the aid pipeline was found in what an initial search returned.
Characterization of the conflict
- 2023-10-11 [Months after October 7, 2023; on this page only]: In the days after the October 7 attacks he said he supported Israel "100%", described the violence against civilians as "animal behavior", and framed the conflict as a proxy war directed by Iran, calling Hamas the "attack dogs for Iran" and asserting Iran authorized the attack to disrupt normalization talks between Israel and Saudi Arabia. The source page is his own release of that date.
- 2023-10 [Months after October 7, 2023; out of scope on recipient as well as date]: He called on the Biden administration to freeze Iranian money after the Hamas attack. That is a position on Iranian assets, not on what the United States sends to Israel or to Palestinians.
- 2026-03-02 [Current position; adjacent, not in scope]: After joint U.S. and Israeli operations against Iranian assets he issued a statement framing the escalation as deterrence: "The Iranian regime’s decades of sponsoring terror, costing American service members and innocent lives, cannot go unanswered. Peace comes through strength, and weakness only emboldens our enemies. The threats against the United States and our allies must be confronted with resolve." A position on U.S. military action rather than on U.S. aid.
Rhetoric and lobbying
- 2023-10-11 [Months after October 7, 2023; on this page only]: He introduced a resolution to censure Representative Rashida Tlaib of Michigan over her comments on the war, saying she had a "longstanding history of antisemitic and racist rhetoric toward Israel" that "cannot go unchecked", and that "There is no moral equivalence between Israel defending itself and Hamas attacking innocent Israeli civilians." Same source page.
- 2025-01-06 [Current position; consulted, carries nothing in scope]: An interview on national security in general. An initial search cites no in-scope claim from it.
- 2026-08-05 [Current position; consulted]: Primary results coverage carrying nothing on this question.
- The record’s existing research already notes that his campaign issues page sets out nine sections, none of which mentions Israel, Gaza, U.S. military aid or foreign assistance of any kind. No link for it was in the sources found, so it is recorded here rather than on the card.
Safety and antisemitism
- 2023-10-11 [Months after October 7, 2023; context only]: In the censure statement he called anti-Jewish tropes "disturbing and evil" and said such rhetoric should have no place in Congress. No standalone antisemitism legislation or campus safety action was located.
Earlier record
- Nothing located before 2023-10-07.
What came back empty or unusable
- No position located on U.S. aid to Palestinians in either direction, which is the half of the content rule this record is silent on.
- Two of six sources found carry no in-scope claim at all.
Also in this race
- ?Mixed Callie Barr (Democrat)
- –No Position Found Zebulon Featherly (Independent)
- –No Position Found Arnett Satterla (Libertarian)
- –No Position Found LaVeta Davenport (Green)
- –No Position Found Doc Kovaly (Other)
- –No Position Found Liz Hakola (Other)
All Michigan candidates.
See everyone on the Michigan ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.