But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Rebecca Whiting

Libertarian · U.S. Senate, Minnesota
–
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

Whiting's non-interventionism is blanket, in her own verified words: "No more wars," "The world's conflicts are not ours to police," and allies "need to learn to run their own countries without the use of US dollars." She names no recipient; nothing located addresses the government of Israel or Palestinians specifically.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Whiting is the Libertarian nominee, an Army combat veteran, farmer, and chair of the Libertarian Party of Minnesota.

Her Ballotpedia survey, which we read in full, answers substantively across the board, so her words are checkable: "End the wars. Adopt policies of nonintervention. Get out of the foreign conflicts. Unless the United States is attacked on our soil, we have no business engaging in military exercises with another country." She would "stop the spending- especially towards foreign wars," get out of NATO, and bring troops home. On allies: "Our friends need to learn to run their own countries without the use of US dollars."

None of it names Israel, Palestinians, or this conflict. A July 2024 statement is reported to criticize taxpayer dollars sent overseas "including the war involving Palestine" and to call such engagements "bipartisan proxy wars," but the pages carrying it could not be opened and the Palestine-specific wording is not on her survey, so it is reported here, not asserted. Applying her blanket rule to this conflict would end U.S. funding of every party to it; she has not said that herself.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-13) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“No more entangling alliances. Our friends need to learn to run their own countries without the use of US dollars.”
Source ↗, 2026-08-14

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, read 2026-08-14] Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey, which we read in full (about 181,000 characters): "End the wars. Adopt policies of nonintervention. Get out of the foreign conflicts. Unless the United States is attacked on our soil, we have no business engaging in military exercises with another country." "Balance the budget, stop the spending- especially towards foreign wars." "No more entangling alliances. Our friends need to learn to run their own countries without the use of US dollars." "Adopt a policy of non-intervention. The world's conflicts are not ours to police." Blanket; no recipient named anywhere on the page (zero occurrences of Israel or Palestine).
  • [Position, 2024-07-27, reported; unverifiable sources] Statement opposing non-defensive wars and taxpayer dollars overseas "including the war involving Palestine," calling such engagements "bipartisan proxy wars" (the localcandidates.org page does not render for us; the Facebook page could not be opened). Reported, not asserted; the wording is not on her verified survey.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located beyond the blanket rule above.

Characterization of the conflict

  • Nothing located naming this conflict; her framing is generic anti-interventionism ("bipartisan proxy wars", as reported, alongside Ukraine).

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Position, 2024-07-27, reported] Criticized establishment and "America First" politicians who support sending taxpayer money overseas as hypocritical given the national debt. No statements on Israel-related lobbying organizations located.
  • [Position, 2024-08-17] Endorsed by the Libertarian Party of Minnesota (lpmn.org).

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing located.

Also in this race

  1. ✓ Peggy Flanagan (Democrat)
  2. ? Michele Tafoya (Republican)
  3. – Marisa Simonetti (Other)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.