But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Gregory F. Murphy

Republican · U.S. House, North Carolina District 3
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Murphy voted for the 2024 Israel supplemental and said why: "In the face of terror and unprovoked aggression, Israel is in a righteous fight for its existence and the United States must stand behind it," adding that Israel "critically needs the support of the West to defend itself."

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Murphy has represented North Carolina's 3rd District since 2019.

His February 2024 statement on voting for H.R. 7217, the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, is his clearest: "In the face of terror and unprovoked aggression, Israel is in a righteous fight for its existence and the United States must stand behind it." He continued: "The nation is our greatest ally in the Middle East and critically needs the support of the West to defend itself against Iranian-backed, extremist militant groups who wish to eradicate it."

His position predates the current war. In a December 2019 interview, his first on the subject after taking office, he said of the U.S.-Israel relationship: "I fully support it; it's the greatest democracy that we have in the Middle East." He added: "It's a critical relationship that we support the democracy, and we support the people." The outlet reported that he agreed with a list of the administration's policies, among them defunding U.S. assistance to the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA, moving the embassy to Jerusalem, withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal and designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organisation. That list is the reporter's, not his wording.

In April 2024 he issued a further statement supporting the national security and foreign aid packages.

His recorded votes appear as badges on this card, and the February 2024 statement is his own explanation of one of them.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to send more support
Notable actions

• Vote record imported from official House Clerk roll calls for H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, and H.R. 8369. Other position fields remain under investigation.

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$23K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $22,900
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$22,900The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“In the face of terror and unprovoked aggression, Israel is in a righteous fight for its existence and the United States must stand behind it.”
Source ↗, 2024-02-06
“The nation is our greatest ally in the Middle East and critically needs the support of the West to defend itself against Iranian-backed, extremist militant groups who wish to eradicate it.”
Source ↗, 2024-02-06
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2024-02-06] His release on voting for H.R. 7217, opened and confirmed word for word: "In the face of terror and unprovoked aggression, Israel is in a righteous fight for its existence and the United States must stand behind it." And: "The nation is our greatest ally in the Middle East and critically needs the support of the West to defend itself against Iranian-backed, extremist militant groups who wish to eradicate it." The release continues into criticism of Senate Democrats over the bill's handling; that part is about congressional process and is not carried on the card.
  • [Position, 2024-04-21] Statement on the House foreign aid and national security packages. Not opened.
  • [Position, 2024-02-09, reported] Spoke on the House floor urging passage of security assistance, saying "Israel is in the fight for its existence." The research's source is a YouTube video; not readable, and the fragment duplicates the verified release above.
  • [Prior, 2019-12-04] Jewish News Syndicate interview, opened and confirmed word for word. His words: "I fully support it; it's the greatest democracy that we have in the Middle East," and "It's a critical relationship that we support the democracy, and we support the people." The defunding item is the outlet's summary, not a quotation: "The new congressman said that he agreed with U.S. President Donald Trump's pro-Israel policies, including recognizing Jerusalem and moving the U.S. embassy there; withdrawing the United States from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal; closing the PLO mission in Washington, D.C.; recognizing the Golan Heights; designating Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist group; defunding U.S. assistance to the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA; and having the United States leave the U.N. Human Rights Council and UNESCO." Before 2023-10-07, so prior band.
  • [After October 7, 2023-11-02] Release on voting for aid to Israel, in which he said Israel "has the right to exist" and "the right to defend itself" and that the invasion "required immediate and decisive action." From the weeks right after October 7; not used on the card. Not opened.
  • His recorded votes appear as badges on this card.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Prior, 2019-12-04] Reported by JNS as agreeing with defunding U.S. assistance to the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA (confirmed above; the outlet's summary of his agreement with a list of policies, not his own wording). Prior band, and the only located position of his on this question. No statement located from him since October 2023 on U.S. humanitarian aid to Palestinians.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2024-10-07] One-year anniversary statement: "Israel was brutally and savagely attacked by the Hamas terrorist group" and "Israel will not be eliminated." Not opened.
  • [Position, 2025-06-13] Statement on Israel's strikes on Iran. Not opened.
  • [After October 7, 2023-10-07] Statement on the attack: "I'm heartbroken to see Israel under attack by bloodthirsty Hamas and Palestinian terrorists who wish to destroy them," affirming Israel's "absolute right to exist." From the weeks right after October 7.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Prior, 2019-12-04] Endorsed closing the Palestine Liberation Organization mission in Washington (per the JNS interview).
  • [2023-12-11] Newsweek reporting on his demand for an apology over a television sketch about a House antisemitism hearing. Third-party reporting, not opened.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • [Position, 2025-02-05; first co-sponsored in October 2023] Co-sponsored H.R. 6090, the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023, and its 119th Congress reintroduction H.R. 1007, directing the Department of Education to consider the IHRA working definition (BillTrack50). Safety context, never an answer about U.S. weapons or funding.

⚠ Other people's material among the sources

Also in this race

  1. – Raymond Smith Jr. (Democrat)
  2. – Daniel Cavender (Libertarian)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.