The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
Fedorchak represents North Dakota’s at-large district, elected in 2024.
Her two recorded votes on the tracked bills, against both amendments to cut aid to Israel, appear as badges on this card, and her official issues page carries her standing frame: "A secure Israel means a more secure America, and my commitment to supporting Israel’s safety and stability is unwavering." Running in 2024 she told Jewish Insider of her "staunch support for continued U.S. assistance to Israel", saying "Israel needs to have the resources necessary to properly secure its safety and stability". In August 2025 she toured Israel and returned optimistic about a post-war Middle East, per local coverage of the trip.
Nothing located has her addressing U.S. aid to Palestinians at any date.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 2 tracked votes
Floor votes
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$15,000The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Republican Jewish Coalition$2,500The Republican Jewish Coalition's PAC; it financially supports Republican candidates who reflect its priorities, including strong U.S. backing of the government of Israel.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.
In their words
“A secure Israel means a more secure America, and my commitment to supporting Israel’s safety and stability is unwavering.”
The issues-page and interview frames above; her bill co-sponsorships in the defense-cooperation space appear via trackers, dates checked.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
[Community context] The JCRC’s welcome of the amendment’s rejection. [Endorsement] The Republican Jewish Coalition’s endorsement, per its own pages. Tracked funding totals appear as a badge on this card.
Safety and antisemitism (context)
Colleague releases in the awareness-act space name her; dates checked.
Race and status context
Sitting member, nominated. Her Democratic challenger’s card carries its own record.
But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and
funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps.
Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.