But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Sean Kirrane

Republican · U.S. House, New Jersey District 5
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: As of August 2026 his campaign platform says "Stand firmly with Israel and take strong action against antisemitism", without saying where he stands on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Kirrane's platform commits him to "stand firmly with Israel and take strong action against antisemitism" and to "strengthen intelligence-sharing and counterterrorism efforts." No position on U.S. weapons or funding was located. Ask him.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Kirrane is the Republican candidate for New Jersey's 5th District.

His campaign platform names Israel once, in a section headed "Standing With Our Allies & Protecting Our Communities." It identifies the issue as "rising crime, antisemitism, and global instability" and lists among his solutions: "Stand firmly with Israel and take strong action against antisemitism," "Stand with law enforcement to keep our communities safe," "Promote unity and reject extremism," and "Strengthen intelligence-sharing and counterterrorism efforts." The stated result is "safer communities and stronger alliances."

That is a statement of alignment. It names no transfer, no package, no dollar figure, and no view on conditions.

He has no federal voting record.

What is not on the record is any position on U.S. weapons or funding for the government of Israel, on conditioning assistance, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians, and no characterization of the conflict itself.

You are better placed to change that than we are. Ask him directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in his own words, which is worth more than anything we could write about him.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“Stand firmly with Israel and take strong action against antisemitism”
Source ↗, 2026-08-12

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • No position located on U.S. weapons transfers, funding measures or conditioning assistance.
  • [Position, read 2026-08-12] His campaign platform, opened and confirmed word for word, under "Standing With Our Allies & Protecting Our Communities": the issue is "Rising crime, antisemitism, and global instability threaten communities at home and abroad," and his listed solutions include "Stand firmly with Israel and take strong action against antisemitism" and "Strengthen intelligence-sharing and counterterrorism efforts." A live page with no publication date, so read-date. **Israel is named once on the page and the commitment is to alignment rather than to any particular transfer or funding level**, and the card presents it as that.
  • He has no federal voting record.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • No statement or documented position located.

Characterization of the conflict

  • No statement located. The platform groups "global instability" with domestic concerns and does not analyse this conflict.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Nothing located.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • [Position, read 2026-08-12] "Take strong action against antisemitism" (confirmed verbatim, in the same line as the Israel commitment, which is why the research page quotes the line whole).

⚠ A source that cannot support a claim

  • A localcandidates.org positions page was returned by the research. Under our standing rule a localcandidates.org citation cannot support a claim unless the page is rendered and the position confirmed under the subject's own heading, and that host cannot be rendered without JavaScript. Nothing is taken from it.

Consulted

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Josh Gottheimer (Democrat)
  2. – Adam Rueda (Other)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.