But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Nicole Malliotakis

Republican · U.S. House, New York District 11
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Malliotakis called for full restoration of Iron Dome funding in the defense authorization bill, saying Israel’s security is tied to America’s. In April 2026 she co-introduced a U.S., Greece and Israel counterterrorism and maritime security pact.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Malliotakis represents New York’s 11th District, covering Staten Island and part of southern Brooklyn.

Her earliest documented position here is appropriations. In September 2021 she called for full restoration of U.S. funding for Iron Dome in the National Defense Authorization Act, arguing Israel’s security is directly tied to U.S. national security.

In April 2026 she co-introduced the bipartisan American-Hellenic-Israeli Eastern Mediterranean Counterterrorism and Maritime Security Pact, H.R. 2510, which is a defense-cooperation measure rather than an aid appropriation.

She has also issued a statement on Netanyahu’s address to Congress and joined colleagues condemning Hamas. Her recorded votes on the tracked bills are shown separately on this card.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to send more support
Notable actions

• Vote record imported from official House Clerk roll calls for H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, and H.R. 8369. Other position fields remain under investigation.

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

Targeted with $190K by PACs we track that support U.S. weapons funding for the government of Israel (2020); $27K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $19,200 · Republican Jewish Coalition: $7,500
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$19,200The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Republican Jewish Coalition$7,500The Republican Jewish Coalition's PAC; it financially supports Republican candidates who reflect its priorities, including strong U.S. backing of the government of Israel.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Money spent against them
Independent expenditures opposing this candidate: advertising and other spending made to defeat them, without the candidate's involvement or consent. DMFI reported 3 independent expenditures opposing this candidate, 2020-10-09 to 2020-11-02, totalling $190K. This counts only the five lobbying groups we track, so it is a floor on what was spent against this candidate, not a total. Each expenditure is counted because the committee itself named this candidate as the target on its FEC filing. These lobbying groups often spend along party lines, or to protect an incumbent they back, so this is not by itself a reading of the candidate's position.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • 2021-09-23 [Earlier record]: Press release calling for full restoration of U.S. funding for Iron Dome in the National Defense Authorization Act, stating Israel’s security is directly tied to U.S. national security.
  • 2023-10-10 [Months after October 7, 2023; on this page only]: As a member of the bipartisan House-Knesset Parliamentary Friendship Group she co-signed a joint statement reaffirming that U.S. commitment to Israel’s defense is "ironclad" and pledging to support additional military assistance requested by Israel. The source page is a colleague’s release.
  • 2023-10-17 [Months after October 7, 2023]: In an op-ed in Hamodia, republished by her office, she called on the United States to deliver precision-guided munitions, missile interceptors and $2 billion in appropriated funding for Iron Dome.
  • 2026-04-25 [Current position]: Co-introduced the bipartisan American-Hellenic-Israeli Eastern Mediterranean Counterterrorism and Maritime Security Pact, H.R. 2510. A defense-cooperation measure rather than an aid appropriation, and the card describes it as such.

Characterization of the conflict

Rhetoric and lobbying

Safety and antisemitism

  • Nothing located separately from the Hamas condemnation above.

What came back empty or unusable

  • No statement located on U.S. aid to Palestinians, UNRWA or Gaza humanitarian funding.
  • Her two most detailed and specific asks, the October 2023 munitions and Iron Dome items, both fall inside the months after October 7, 2023, so the card rests on a 2021 appropriations position and a 2026 cooperation bill instead. The research page carries the fuller picture.
  • One source found is about a different member of Congress.

Also in this race

  1. – Michael DeCillis (Democrat)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.