But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Paul Tonko

Democrat · U.S. House, New York District 20
?Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 6 tracked votes

Tonko says existing U.S. law forbids military aid to gross human rights violators and that Netanyahu’s government meets that standard, so he will not back more aid enabling it to "bomb other countries relentlessly" on American taxpayers’ account.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Tonko represents New York’s 20th District. His position rests on a legal argument rather than a general objection, and he has held it consistently for two years.

In April 2024, on foreign aid legislation, he expressed deep concerns about sending additional offensive weapons to Israel and urged the administration to use existing federal law to scrutinise the Israeli government’s conduct and withhold military assistance where human rights or international law violations occurred.

By July 2026 he stated the conclusion directly: U.S. law forbids military aid to entities committing gross human rights violations, the Netanyahu government meets that standard through its conduct in Gaza, and he would not support additional military aid enabling it to "bomb other countries relentlessly with the implicit support of the American taxpayers".

In between, at a Troy town hall in June 2025, he labelled the Gaza conflict a genocide.

On the first anniversary of the attacks he condemned Hamas’s assault as a terrorist action and the deadliest attack on Jewish people since the Holocaust, while describing unprecedented anguish in Gaza and calling for an immediate permanent ceasefire. His recorded votes on the tracked bills are shown separately on this card.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 6 tracked votes · Cosponsors the Block the Bombs Act

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✓ Voted Yes
voted to limit or block it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to restrict weapons transfers
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
Notable actions

• Vote record imported from official House Clerk roll calls for H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, and H.R. 8369. Other position fields remain under investigation.

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in some, but no more than half, of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
✓ Endorsed by Peace Action +1 more
Peace ActionA national peace and disarmament group. Its endorsements cover war, Pentagon spending and diplomacy broadly, not only U.S. weapons for the government of Israel.A New Policy PACA group backing congressional candidates who want a new U.S. policy toward Israel and Palestine grounded in U.S. and international law, including conditions on military aid.These endorsements come from groups that push to restrict or end U.S. weapons transfers to the government of Israel. Endorsements from these groups are shown for information; they do not decide the mark.

In their words

“bomb other countries relentlessly with the implicit support of the American taxpayers”
Source ↗, 2026-07-15
Endorsements

Peace Action (2026 endorsement) · A New Policy PAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • 2024-04-20 [Current position]: Official statement on foreign aid legislation expressing deep concerns about sending additional offensive weapons to Israel, and urging the administration to use existing federal law to scrutinise Israeli government conduct and withhold military assistance if human rights or international law violations occurred.
  • 2026-07-15 [Current position]: Press statement on an amendment to halt certain U.S. funding: existing U.S. law forbids military aid to entities committing gross human rights violations; the Netanyahu government meets that standard through its conduct in Gaza; he would not support additional military aid enabling the prime minister to "bomb other countries relentlessly with the implicit support of the American taxpayers".

Characterization of the conflict

  • 2024-10-07 [Current position]: Marking one year since the attacks, he condemned the Hamas assault as a "terrorist action" and the "deadliest attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust", while highlighting "unprecedented anguish in Gaza", noting the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians, and calling for an immediate permanent ceasefire. Statements at DocumentID 4234 and 4325.
  • 2025-06-18 [Current position]: At a Troy town hall he labelled the Gaza conflict a genocide. Independent local reporting, which makes it a well-sourced genocide characterisation.

Rhetoric and lobbying

  • Further statement at DocumentID 4174, from which an initial search extracted no dated in-scope claim, and a video.

Safety and antisemitism

  • Nothing located separately from the anniversary statement above.

What came back empty or unusable

  • No statement located on U.S. aid to Palestinians or UNRWA as a budget line.
  • Five of seven source pages are his own House permalinks. Stable but not independent, with the WAMC town-hall report the notable exception.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Ralph Ambrosio (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.