But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
John W. Mannion
Mannion voted yes on the Massie Amendment, saying the U.S. "cannot continue providing military assistance without stronger oversight, meaningful accountability, and clear conditions". He called the amendment flawed and the status quo untenable, and backs Israel's right to defend itself.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
You asked John W. Mannion where they stand.
Deep Dive
Mannion represents New York’s 22nd District around Syracuse, previously served in the State Senate, and is running for re-election.
He explained his vote himself, on his own House site, on the day. The statement of July 15, 2026 reads: "Israel is a vital American ally and the only democracy in the Middle East. The best way to support the Israeli people and protect Israel’s long-term security is to reject an indefensible status quo and fundamentally reset our relationship with the far-right Netanyahu government. I voted yes on the Massie Amendment because the United States cannot continue providing military assistance without stronger oversight, meaningful accountability, and clear conditions governing how American weapons are used. I have and will continue to support Israel’s right to defend itself. But while this Amendment is flawed, the status quo is untenable. The Netanyahu government must change course."
So his vote was for conditions rather than against the alliance, and he says the vehicle was imperfect. That is the whole of the badge-versus-position problem answered in the candidate’s own words.
During his 2024 campaign he set out a position supporting continued security assistance to Israel alongside humanitarian aid to Palestinians, with U.S. oversight of how military aid is used. In June 2025 he stood "firmly with our ally Israel" against threats from Iran. In October 2025 he called Hamas a terrorist organisation that "cannot govern", described Gaza as a humanitarian crisis causing intolerable civilian suffering, and said a negotiated two-state solution is the only lasting path. Days later he commended ceasefire diplomacy and called for international assistance to rebuild Gaza.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 1 of 2 tracked votes
• Vote record imported from official House Clerk roll calls for H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, and H.R. 8369. Other position fields remain under investigation.
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in some, but no more than half, of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 1 of 2 tracked votes.)
The money
Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found
In their words
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- 2026-07-15 [Current position; VERIFIED]: "Statement from Representative Mannion (NY-22) on the Massie Amendment", read in full. Verbatim: "Israel is a vital American ally and the only democracy in the Middle East. The best way to support the Israeli people and protect Israel's long-term security is to reject an indefensible status quo and fundamentally reset our relationship with the far-right Netanyahu government. I voted yes on the Massie Amendment because the United States cannot continue providing military assistance without stronger oversight, meaningful accountability, and clear conditions governing how American weapons are used. I have and will continue to support Israel's right to defend itself. But while this Amendment is flawed, the status quo is untenable. The Netanyahu government must change course. Its conduct has" caused intolerable suffering in Gaza, undermined the prospects for peace, and damaged Israel's standing, per an initial search's fuller rendering of the closing sentence.
⚠ **THIS RECORD SETTLES THE H.R. 8595 AMENDMENT QUESTION FROM A MEMBER'S OWN MOUTH.** His badge records Yes on the Massie amendment to H.R. 8595 and his own House statement says "I voted yes on the Massie Amendment". That is direct confirmation that the tracked roll call is the Massie Amendment and that a Yes vote means supporting a cut to military aid, not supporting the funding bill. Fifth independent confirmation, and the only one in a candidate's own words. ⚠ **BADGE VERSUS POSITION, ANSWERED BY THE CANDIDATE.** A Yes on a cut, plus continued support for Israel's right to defend itself, plus calling the amendment flawed, is one coherent position and only the statement makes it legible.
- 2024-06 [Current position]: During his 2024 campaign he set out support for continued security assistance to Israel alongside humanitarian aid to Palestinians, with U.S. oversight and standards on how military aid is used. The source page is his campaign site; local coverage of the primary of 2024-06-21 records him and his primary opponent supporting a ceasefire in Gaza.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- 2024-06 [Current position]: The same 2024 position pairs continued security assistance to Israel with humanitarian aid to Palestinians. Both recipients named by him.
- 2025-10-10 [Current position]: Statement on the ceasefire and a path to peace commending diplomatic efforts, calling for the immediate release of all hostages, an end to civilian suffering, and international assistance to rebuild Gaza.
Characterization of the conflict
- 2024-10-07 [Current position]: One-year anniversary statement describing the attack as "the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust" and affirming Israel's responsibility to defend its sovereignty. The source page an initial search attached is a Facebook post from a state senator's account which would not open and is not his, so the statement is recorded as an initial search’s.
- 2025-06-13 [Current position]: Statement standing "firmly with our ally Israel in the face of ongoing threats and hostilities from Iran", characterising the Iranian regime as arming and funding Hamas and Hezbollah.
- 2025-10-07 [Current position]: Two-year anniversary statement calling Hamas a "terrorist organization" that "cannot govern", describing Gaza as a severe "humanitarian crisis" causing intolerable civilian suffering, and reiterating that a secure negotiated two-state solution is the only lasting path.
Rhetoric and lobbying
- 2024-06-21 [Current position]: Local coverage of him advocating diplomatic engagement toward a two-state solution.
- 2026-07-15 [Current position]: In the Massie statement he said the "far-right Netanyahu government must change course" because its conduct "has caused intolerable suffering in Gaza, undermined the prospects for peace, and done tremendous damage to Israel's standing around the world".
- [Consulted]: A J Street PAC candidate page of 2025-02-25 and a Facebook post about a Jewish Democratic Council of America endorsement which would not open. Advocacy and endorsement material, recorded as consulted; never carries a card.
Safety and antisemitism
[Context only, never the answer to what America sends. Campus measures are named out of scope.]
- 2024-01-16 [Months after October 7, 2023]: As a state senator he condemned antisemitic graffiti at SUNY Upstate in Syracuse, calling it a hate crime and saying "there is no place for hate in Central New York". The state Senate page would not open.
- 2024-08-20 [Current position]: A campaign plan on combating hate speech and antisemitism in Central New York.
- 2026-06-26 [Current position; out of scope]: Committee work on campus antisemitism measures on the House Education and Workforce Committee (Jewish Insider, which an initial search records as not naming him).
- 2026-07-07 [Current position]: He co-sponsored federal legislation to counter antisemitism and protect Jewish communities.
What came back empty or unusable
- Three source pages would not open: a state senator's Facebook post used for his own anniversary statement, his own campaign Facebook post, the state Senate newsroom page, and a LegiScan profile.
- An initial search’s note on this record says congressional roll-call votes, PAC money and contributions were excluded from its search by instruction, which is worth knowing when reading how little vote material it returned.
Also in this race
- ?Mixed Kailee Buller (Republican)
All New York candidates.
See everyone on the New York ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.