Yvette D. Clarke

Democrat · U.S. House, New York District 9

Clarke backs continued U.S. funding for Iron Dome and Israeli defences. She voted against the Israel-only supplemental, calling it a "cynical ploy that will only worsen the humanitarian crisis in Gaza", and demands Israel let food and medicine into Gaza.

Clarke represents New York’s 9th District in central Brooklyn, chairs the Congressional Black Caucus, and is running for re-election.

Her record holds both directions of the money question at once, and all of it is on her own House site. In April 2024, after Iran launched drones and missiles at Israel, she said the attack "encapsulates the need to continue funding critical systems like the Iron Dome and aiding Israeli defenses with our nation’s military assets", and that "The United States has a responsibility to stand with our ally by supporting Israel’s ability to protect its people and territory from wanton aggression".

Two months earlier she had voted against a standalone Israel aid bill and explained why in her own words: "Instead of serving the interests of our national security, this legislation stands as a cynical ploy that will only worsen the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and benefits terror groups like Hamas, who look to capitalize off of the unfolding chaos. We cannot justifiably ignore the plight of the Palestinian people caught in the middle." So a No vote on an Israel aid bill and support for funding Israeli missile defence are, on her account, the same position.

On U.S. aid to Palestinians she has been direct. In July 2025 she said "the continuation of famine in Gaza is a moral catastrophe that America cannot and must not abide by", that "Israel takes every possible action to ensure food, water, and medicine flow into the Strip at once" is crucial, and urged the administration to use its influence to make that happen.

She has called a two-state solution the only acceptable foundation for peace. Her recorded votes on the tracked bills are shown separately on this card.

Tracked votes: opposed sending U.S. weapons or funding to the government of Israel in 3 of 6 recorded votes.

Research

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

⚠ **BADGE VERSUS POSITION, RESOLVED BY THE CANDIDATE HERSELF, ON HER OWN SITE, ABOUT THE EXACT TRACKED BILL.** Her badge records a No on hr7217-118. Read alone that looks like opposition to aiding Israel. Her statement, published the day of the vote and titled for the bill, says she opposed it because it ignored Palestinian humanitarian need. The writing contract permits characterizing a vote when the candidate has spoken about it, and no record in this group meets that condition more cleanly.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

This is an aid-access position directed at Israel and at the U.S. administration's leverage, rather than a U.S. appropriations position, and the card is worded to that distinction.

Characterization of the conflict

Rhetoric and lobbying

Safety and antisemitism

[Context only, never the answer to what America sends. Antisemitism legislation is named out of scope by the content rule.]

What came back empty or unusable

See the full record →

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open the interactive card for votes, funding and contact details.