But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Shontel M. Brown

Democrat · U.S. House, Ohio District 11
?Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 5 tracked votes

Brown voted present on the July 2026 amendment, calling it "a false choice between eliminating all U.S. assistance to Israel, including humanitarian aid, and accepting the Trump-Netanyahu status quo." She said "it's time to send a message that U.S. policy must evolve."

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Brown has represented Ohio's 11th District since 2021.

Her July 2026 statement explains an unusual vote in her own words: "The Massie amendment was a false choice between eliminating all U.S. assistance to Israel, including humanitarian aid, and accepting the Trump-Netanyahu status quo. Foreign policy decisions this important shouldn't be made via sloppy amendments to partisan spending bills."

She then says what she did: "I voted against the underlying bill and present on the amendment because it's time to send a message that U.S. policy must evolve. As a supporter of the U.S.-Israel relationship and a believer that a two-state solution is critical to achieving real peace, I am severely concerned that the Netanyahu government is continuing on the exact wrong course." She closed by calling for "an honest debate about how our policy must change to truly advance Israel's security, protect Palestinian dignity, and promote stability in the Middle East."

In April 2024 she voted for the national security supplemental and said: "Today, the House of Representatives sent a strong, unified signal to the world: America stands by our allies and supports people in need."

In January 2025 she welcomed the ceasefire and hostage agreement, calling October 7 the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust and expressing hope for an end to the fighting and aid reaching Palestinian civilians.

Her recorded votes appear as badges on this card.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 5 tracked votes

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
– Present
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to send more support
Notable actions

• Vote record imported from official House Clerk roll calls for H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, and H.R. 8369. Other position fields remain under investigation.

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in some, but no more than half, of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 5 tracked votes.)

The money

$1.6M in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $22,900 · United Democracy Project: $80,539.13 · DMFI: $1,505,216.03
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$22,900The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.United Democracy Project$80,539.13A super PAC founded by AIPAC in 2022; it spends independently to support candidates aligned with AIPAC's positions and to oppose those who are not.DMFI PAC$1,505,216.03Democratic Majority for Israel's PAC; calls itself the home for pro-Israel Democrats and backs Democratic candidates who support a strong U.S. alliance with the government of Israel.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC +1 more
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.DMFI PACDemocratic Majority for Israel's PAC; calls itself the home for pro-Israel Democrats and backs Democratic candidates who support a strong U.S. alliance with the government of Israel.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“The Massie amendment was a false choice between eliminating all U.S. assistance to Israel, including humanitarian aid, and accepting the Trump-Netanyahu status quo. Foreign policy decisions this important shouldn't be made via sloppy amendments to partisan spending bills.”
Source ↗, 2026-07-15
“I voted against the underlying bill and present on the amendment because it's time to send a message that U.S. policy must evolve.”
Source ↗, 2026-07-15
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement) · DMFI PAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2026-07-15] Her statement on the Massie amendment, opened and confirmed word for word: "The Massie amendment was a false choice between eliminating all U.S. assistance to Israel, including humanitarian aid, and accepting the Trump-Netanyahu status quo. Foreign policy decisions this important shouldn't be made via sloppy amendments to partisan spending bills." And: "I voted against the underlying bill and present on the amendment because it's time to send a message that U.S. policy must evolve. As a supporter of the U.S.-Israel relationship and a believer that a two-state solution is critical to achieving real peace, I am severely concerned that the Netanyahu government is continuing on the exact wrong course." And: "It's time for Congress to have an honest debate about how our policy must change to truly advance Israel's security, protect Palestinian dignity, and promote stability in the Middle East."

She states here that she voted **present** on the amendment, and her tracked votes on this site record the same.

  • [Position, 2024-04-20] Her statement on the national security supplemental, opened and confirmed word for word: "Today, the House of Representatives sent a strong, unified signal to the world: America stands by our allies and supports people in need." The release frames the package as supporting and defending allies and providing humanitarian aid, and criticises months of Republican delay.
  • [Prior, 2023-05-23] Her foreign affairs issues page, as reported, describes Israel as "a key democratic ally of the United States" and states support for "deepening our diplomatic, economic, and military cooperation with Israel." Dated before 2023-10-07 in the research, so prior band. Not opened.
  • Her recorded votes appear as badges on this card.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Position, 2026-07-15] Her objection to the amendment rests substantially on its effect on humanitarian aid, and she calls for policy that "protect[s] Palestinian dignity" (confirmed verbatim, above).
  • [Position, 2025-01-15] As reported, welcomed the ceasefire agreement and hoped it would deliver "needed aid to Palestinian civilians" (her statement). Not opened.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2026-07-15] "I am severely concerned that the Netanyahu government is continuing on the exact wrong course" (confirmed verbatim).
  • [Position, 2025-01-15, reported] Called October 7 "the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust" while hoping for "a path to lasting stability and security for both Israelis and Palestinians."
  • [Position, 2026-02-12, reported] Asked by a reporter about halting violence in Gaza, said "I have called for a ceasefire." The research's source is a YouTube short; not readable.
  • [After October 7, 2023-10-07] Statement condemning the attacks as an "unprovoked assault." From the weeks right after October 7; not used on the card.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Undated] An advocacy site, boughtbyzionism.org, carries a page about her. Advocacy source, consulted only, never a card source, and no claim about her is drawn from it.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • [Position, 2025-05-22] Statement on the attack at the Capital Jewish Museum. Safety context, never an answer about U.S. weapons or funding. Not opened.
  • [Prior, 2023-05-23, reported] On her role with the Bipartisan Task Force for Combating Antisemitism. Prior band and context.

⚠ Wrong-person source, and a serious one

  • The research's October 10, 2023 statement, including "every tool available to support Israel and defeat Hamas" and "we are united behind Israel and against these horrifying acts of terrorism," is cited to banking.senate.gov. That page was opened and confirmed to be **Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH)**, then Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. **Two Ohio Democrats named Brown, one a Senator and one a Representative.** The statement is his, not hers, and nothing from it is used.

Also in this race

  1. – Mike Kirchner (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.