But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Joyce Beatty

Democrat · U.S. House, Ohio District 3
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 6 tracked votes

Beatty backed the April 2024 package as "aiding Israel in its conflict with Hamas" while saying its humanitarian aid "extends a lifeline to families and children enduring unconscionable hardship in Gaza."

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Beatty has represented Ohio's 3rd District since 2013.

Her April 2024 statement on the national security funding package is her only located statement in the position band, and it takes both halves together: the appropriations are "vital in supporting the Ukrainian people against Russian President Putin's unprovoked war, aiding Israel in its conflict with Hamas, and safeguarding our partners in the Indo-Pacific from Chinese aggression. Additionally, the humanitarian aid included in this legislation extends a lifeline to families and children enduring unconscionable hardship in Gaza, Ukraine, Haiti, Myanmar, and other conflict zones around the world."

She added: "Passage of this national security funding package was long overdue... Israel faces threats to its very existence from Hamas and Iran."

The rest of her located record predates the war by years. In 2015 she said, on the Iran nuclear agreement, that she had supported Israel's security and military readiness throughout her time in office, and, on Prime Minister Netanyahu's address to Congress, that a nuclear armed Iran is unacceptable. In 2017 she said any measure toward a peaceful resolution should be a product of direct, bilateral negotiations. Neither release was opened, so both are summarised rather than quoted.

Her recorded votes appear as badges on this card and are not uniform. Beyond the April 2024 statement, no explanation of them in her own words was located.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 6 tracked votes

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
Notable actions

• Vote record imported from official House Clerk roll calls for H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, and H.R. 8369. Other position fields remain under investigation.

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in exactly half of their recorded tracked votes. The tie is broken by money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track and an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 3 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$19K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $12,100 · DMFI: $7,320
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$12,100The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.DMFI PAC$7,320Democratic Majority for Israel's PAC; calls itself the home for pro-Israel Democrats and backs Democratic candidates who support a strong U.S. alliance with the government of Israel.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC +1 more
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.DMFI PACDemocratic Majority for Israel's PAC; calls itself the home for pro-Israel Democrats and backs Democratic candidates who support a strong U.S. alliance with the government of Israel.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“The humanitarian aid included in this legislation extends a lifeline to families and children enduring unconscionable hardship in Gaza, Ukraine, Haiti, Myanmar, and other conflict zones around the world.”
Source ↗, 2024-04-20
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement) · DMFI PAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2024-04-20] Her statement on House passage of the national security funding bills, opened and confirmed word for word: the appropriations are "vital in supporting the Ukrainian people against Russian President Putin's unprovoked war, aiding Israel in its conflict with Hamas, and safeguarding our partners in the Indo-Pacific from Chinese aggression. Additionally, the humanitarian aid included in this legislation extends a lifeline to families and children enduring unconscionable hardship in Gaza, Ukraine, Haiti, Myanmar, and other conflict zones around the world." And: "Passage of this national security funding package was long overdue... Israel faces threats to its very existence from Hamas and Iran."
  • [Prior, 2015-09-10] Statement on the Iran nuclear agreement, as reported: emphasised her commitment to Israel's defence and noted she had supported Israel's security and military readiness throughout her time in office. Eleven years old, prior band. Not opened.
  • **No other statement located.** Apart from April 2024, no statement of hers was located addressing U.S. weapons or funding for Israel since October 2023, and no explanation in her own words of the votes on this card.
  • Her recorded votes appear as badges on this card and are not uniform.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Position, 2024-04-20] The humanitarian-aid passage above, which names Gaza first among the conflict zones (confirmed verbatim).

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2024-04-20] "Israel faces threats to its very existence from Hamas and Iran," alongside families and children in Gaza "enduring unconscionable hardship" (confirmed verbatim). Both halves are in the same statement, which is why the card carries both.
  • [After October 7, 2023-10] Joined an Ohio congressional delegation joint statement condemning Hamas and saying "Israel has every right to defend itself from acts of war and terrorism." From the weeks right after October 7, and a joint statement, so no individual quote is drawn from it. **The research supplies no URL for this item at all.**
  • [Prior, 2017-01-05] Backed a House resolution objecting to a UN Security Council resolution, saying, as reported that any measure toward a peaceful solution should be a product of direct, bilateral negotiations. Prior band, not opened, so summarised rather than quoted.
  • [Prior, 2015-10-16] Statement on events in Israel: "deeply concerned about the recent violent attacks against Israeli civilians." Prior band by eleven years.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Prior, 2015-03-03] Statement on Prime Minister Netanyahu's address: she attended despite objecting to how the invitation was handled, and, as reported said a nuclear armed Iran is unacceptable. Prior band, not opened, so summarised rather than quoted.
  • No statement located regarding pro-Israel lobbying organisations.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

⚠ Note on the sources

  • One source resolved to **null**, and three are **paginated index pages** rather than articles: a media-centre page 14 and two issue-index pages (local issues, other). Paginated indexes are listing pages and cannot support a claim about anyone. The October 2023 delegation statement, which the research quotes, has no URL of any kind. Of twelve sources, five are unusable and two are duplicates.

Also in this race

  1. – Cleophus Dulaney (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.