John F. Reed

Democrat · U.S. Senate, Rhode Island

Reed's votes mostly let U.S. arms sales to the government of Israel proceed, though he voted to stop sales of assault rifles and armored bulldozers. As Armed Services chairman he said the war had "veered off course" and called for a fundamental course correction.

Reed is Rhode Island's senior senator, seeking re-election, and sits on both the Armed Services and Appropriations committees, which makes him one of the members with real influence over what the United States sends and what it pays for.

His voting record is not uniform, and the shape of it is the point. He supported the national security supplemental that carried U.S. military aid to the government of Israel, and on the resolutions that would have blocked particular sales he mostly voted to let them go ahead. Twice he did not: he voted to stop a sale of fully automatic assault rifles and, later, a sale of armored bulldozers, while on the same days letting sales of bombs and munitions through. That is a line drawn between categories of weapon.

He has explained the thinking on the Senate floor. In March 2024, as chairman of the Armed Services Committee, he said he supported Israel's defense and had deep reservations about how the war was being fought: "The United States will continue to support Israel as it works to degrade and defeat Hamas, but I have deep reservations about the conduct of this war." And: "it is my duty to say clearly that this war has veered off course. There must be a fundamental course correction for the national security interests of Israel, America, and our allies and partners."

He has kept both halves since. Defending the aid package a month later he said the operation had to conform to the laws of war and that the same legislation carried humanitarian money, and said he would support a ceasefire if both sides agreed to one. In August 2026, after the Israeli prime minister rejected an American plan, he called him and the president impediments to peace and asked what leverage the United States still has: "It is time for a drastically new approach in Gaza that significantly boosts humanitarian aid as well as a recommitment to a two-state solution by all parties."

Tracked votes: backed sending U.S. weapons or funding to the government of Israel in 8 of 10 recorded votes.

Research

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

U.S. aid to Palestinians

Characterization of the conflict

Related rhetoric and lobbying

Safety and antisemitism (context)

Race and status context

See the full record →

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open the interactive card for votes, funding and contact details.