But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Jack Reed

Democrat · U.S. Senate, Rhode Island
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 8 of 10 tracked votes

Reed's votes mostly let U.S. arms sales to the government of Israel proceed, though he voted to stop sales of assault rifles and armored bulldozers. As Armed Services chairman he said the war had "veered off course" and called for a fundamental course correction.

✉  Copy a message to send them

The only address on file for this campaign is its compliance or filing contact, which will not answer a policy question. Copy this message and send it through their website or a public social account.

If you send this from your own email, cc replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org so we can post their answer.

✆  Call DC officeWebsite ↗X ↗Facebook ↗

Deep Dive

Reed is Rhode Island's senior senator, seeking re-election, and sits on both the Armed Services and Appropriations committees, which makes him one of the members with real influence over what the United States sends and what it pays for.

His voting record is not uniform, and the shape of it is the point. He supported the national security supplemental that carried U.S. military aid to the government of Israel, and on the resolutions that would have blocked particular sales he mostly voted to let them go ahead. Twice he did not: he voted to stop a sale of fully automatic assault rifles and, later, a sale of armored bulldozers, while on the same days letting sales of bombs and munitions through. That is a line drawn between categories of weapon.

He has explained the thinking on the Senate floor. In March 2024, as chairman of the Armed Services Committee, he said he supported Israel's defense and had deep reservations about how the war was being fought: "The United States will continue to support Israel as it works to degrade and defeat Hamas, but I have deep reservations about the conduct of this war." And: "it is my duty to say clearly that this war has veered off course. There must be a fundamental course correction for the national security interests of Israel, America, and our allies and partners."

He has kept both halves since. Defending the aid package a month later he said the operation had to conform to the laws of war and that the same legislation carried humanitarian money, and said he would support a ceasefire if both sides agreed to one. In August 2026, after the Israeli prime minister rejected an American plan, he called him and the president impediments to peace and asked what leverage the United States still has: "It is time for a drastically new approach in Gaza that significantly boosts humanitarian aid as well as a recommitment to a two-state solution by all parties."

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 8 of 10 tracked votes

Committees

Senate Committee on Appropriations · Senate Committee on Armed Services

Floor votes
H.R. 815 - National Security Supplemental2024-04-23 · Passed 79-18 (Senate)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
S.J.Res. 111 - disapproving sale of 120mm tank rounds to Israel2024-11-20 · Failed 18-79
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 113 - disapproving sale of 120mm high-explosive mortar rounds to Israel2024-11-20 · Failed 19-78
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 115 - disapproving sale of JDAM bomb guidance kits to Israel2024-11-20 · Failed 17-80
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 26 - disapproving $6.75B sale of bombs and guidance kits to Israel2025-04-03 · Failed 15-83
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 33 - disapproving $2.04B sale of 2,000-lb bombs to Israel2025-04-03 · Failed 15-82
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 34 - disapproving $675.7M sale of 1,000-lb bombs and JDAM kits to Israel2025-07-30 · Failed 24-73
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 41 - disapproving sale of fully automatic assault rifles to Israel2025-07-30 · Motion to Discharge Rejected 27-70
✓ Voted Yes
voted to limit or block it
S.J.Res. 32 - disapproving $295M sale of D9 Caterpillar armored bulldozers to Israel2026-04-15 · Failed 40-59
✓ Voted Yes
voted to limit or block it
S.J.Res. 138 - disapproving $151.8M sale of 1,000-lb bombs to Israel2026-04-15 · Failed 36-63
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
S. 554 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Senate companion to H.R. 1229.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 8 of 10 tracked votes.)

The money

$8K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $5,000 · DMFI: $2,500
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$5,000The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.DMFI PAC$2,500Democratic Majority for Israel's PAC; calls itself the home for pro-Israel Democrats and backs Democratic candidates who support a strong U.S. alliance with the government of Israel.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“The United States will continue to support Israel as it works to degrade and defeat Hamas, but I have deep reservations about the conduct of this war.”
Source ↗, 2024-03-19
“it is my duty to say clearly that this war has veered off course. There must be a fundamental course correction for the national security interests of Israel, America, and our allies and partners.”
Source ↗, 2024-03-19
“This is yet more failed leadership from both Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. They are both impediments to lasting, durable peace. It is time for a drastically new approach in Gaza that significantly boosts humanitarian aid as well as a recommitment to a two-state solution by all parties.”
Source ↗, 2026-08-10
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2024 to 2026] His ten recorded Senate votes are rendered on this card with their own official roll-call sources and are not re-listed here. Their direction, which is what the prose is for: for the national security supplemental carrying U.S. military aid to the government of Israel; against advancing the disapproval resolutions on sales of tank rounds, mortar rounds, bomb guidance kits, bombs and munitions; and for advancing the two resolutions that would have stopped a sale of fully automatic assault rifles and a sale of armored bulldozers. On both of those days he voted the other way on the accompanying bomb resolution, so the split is between kinds of weapon rather than between periods. Every vote was cross-checked against the official roll call, for example the rifles resolution and the bulldozers resolution.
  • [Position, 2024-03-19] Senate floor speech, published in full by his office and read and confirmed word for word. The spans that matter: "As I have continued to make clear, Israel can and must defend itself against the military threat from Hamas." And: "The United States will continue to support Israel as it works to degrade and defeat Hamas, but I have deep reservations about the conduct of this war." And: "It is clear to me, now five months into this war, that Israel's strategy to defeat Hamas is in peril." And: "Today, as Chairman of the Armed Services Committee, and as a friend and supporter of the Israeli people, it is my duty to say clearly that this war has veered off course. There must be a fundamental course correction for the national security interests of Israel, America, and our allies and partners." This speech is the source of the two phrases this record had been carrying in quotation marks with nothing behind them.
  • [Position, 2024-04-25] Telephone interview with The Public's Radio, read and confirmed. He voted for the aid package and defended it in terms of conditions on its use: "we've made it very clear, the president directly to Prime Minister Netanyahu, that their operation has to conform with the basic laws of war, which is to do all you can to spare civilian population and also you must provide humanitarian assistance." On a ceasefire: "I would call or support a ceasefire, but it has to be mutually agreed by both Hamas and the state of Israel," and he put significant blame on Hamas for refusing frameworks.
  • [Position, 2026-08-10] Statement after the Israeli prime minister rejected an American-backed plan, confirmed word for word: "This is yet more failed leadership from both Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. They are both impediments to lasting, durable peace. It is time for a drastically new approach in Gaza that significantly boosts humanitarian aid as well as a recommitment to a two-state solution by all parties." And: "Congress deserves a clear explanation from this administration of what happens next, what leverage the United States still has, and how this rejection affects American forces and interests in the region."
  • [Unconfirmed, 2025-06-13] A fresh search reported him describing an Israeli strike on Iran as a "reckless escalation". The page cited refuses to open to us, so nothing from it is quoted.
  • [Position, read 2026-08-17] Nothing located on his campaign site, which carries campaign material and a general statement about delivering for Rhode Islanders.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2024-03-19] From the floor speech: he said the Israeli government had no clear end game and no plan for the day after the fighting stops, described conditions in Gaza at length, and endorsed the argument that the Israeli prime minister's policies had created much of the situation.
  • [Position, 2024-04-25] From the interview: he had already called for the resignation of the Palestinian Authority president, and said the Israeli prime minister "would do his country and the world a great service if he resigned."
  • [Position, 2025-01-17] Statement welcoming the ceasefire and hostage agreement, which reaffirms the American commitment to Israel's security and calls for an end to Hamas control of Gaza.
  • [Position, 2026-08-10] The statement above.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • American Israel Public Affairs Committee and Democratic Majority for Israel support are badges on this card and are not restated. No endorsement from any advocacy group this site tracks is recorded.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

Race and status context

  • Incumbent U.S. senator and a candidate in the Democratic primary, per Ballotpedia's race page. Member of the Appropriations and Armed Services committees per the congress-legislators committee roster.
  • Sources we could not open, written out so a reader can see what is missing: https://api.congress.gov/v3/member/R000122 and https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/119/s/554/cosponsors?format=json&limit=250&offset=0 . Both returned 403. They are identity and roster lookups, not sources for anything on this card.

Also in this race

  1. – Ray McKay (Republican)
  2. ? Michael Bahry (Independent)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.