Brian Bengs
Bengs wrote that the United States "provides Israel's arsenal" and must "enforce accountability by imposing consequences" for the government of Israel's disregard of the law of armed conflict. He says America is partly responsible for the strikes on Iran because it is the primary weapons source.
Bengs is running for the U.S. Senate in South Dakota as an independent. He is a retired Air Force judge advocate and lieutenant colonel who taught international law and the law of armed conflict, and he has never held elected office, so none of the congressional votes this site tracks are his.
In September 2025 he published a long essay working through whether what has happened in Gaza meets the legal definition of genocide. It sets out the American share of the arrangement in numbers: more than 86 percent of annual American aid to the government of Israel is military aid, about 16 percent of that government's defense budget, meant to preserve a "qualitative military edge". His conclusion from that: "In essence, the United States provides Israel's arsenal." And what should follow: "As Israel's primary benefactor on the international stage, the U.S. government must enforce accountability by imposing consequences for Israel's disregard of LOAC." That last is the sentence this site had been carrying with no source behind it.
He applies the same reasoning to weapons already delivered. Asked in June 2025 about the strikes on Iran, he said the United States bears part of the responsibility because the aircraft were American: "to an extent we are partially responsible in the sense that we are the primary weapons source for Israel." He also said the strikes had no legal grounds and set a bad precedent.
He is careful about who he is criticizing. The essay opens by separating governments from populations: "Benjamin Netanyahu, his cabinet, and his belligerent policies in this war are not equivalent with the Israeli people. Gaza's Hamas leaders are not equivalent with the Palestinian people." He also writes that he expects to be called antisemitic for it, and invites readers to reply and show him where he has the facts or the law wrong.
Research
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- [Position, 2025-09-10] Essay on his own campaign publication, "Is There Genocide In Gaza?: A Former Law Professor's Analysis", dated on the page and read and confirmed word for word. The passages that matter: "In the last two decades, over 86% of America's annual aid to Israel has been military aid, with U.S. financing comprising about 16% of the Israeli government's defense budget. The justification for this approach has been for U.S. aid to maintain Israel's "qualitative military edge" by giving them access to advanced versions of American technology. In essence, the United States provides Israel's arsenal." And, in his conclusion: "As Israel's primary benefactor on the international stage, the U.S. government must enforce accountability by imposing consequences for Israel's disregard of LOAC. To do that, we need elected officials who understand the historical, political, and legal context of Israel and Palestine." LOAC is his abbreviation for the law of armed conflict, spelled out in the essay's opening. This is the source of the accountability claim this record had been carrying with no date and no page.
- [Position, 2025-06-14] Interview with KOTA, dated on the page and confirmed: "I think Iran has already said we are partially responsible, and to an extent we are partially responsible in the sense that we are the primary weapons source for Israel," and "They get their aircraft, I believe it was 200 aircraft I heard were used in this strike, they're probably almost all going to be American aircraft." The station also reports him saying the strikes lacked legal grounds and set a bad precedent. Note for the reader: this same report carries a statement from the incumbent senator in this race, who has his own card here; that statement is used on his card and not on this one.
- [Unconfirmed, 2025-09-09] A fresh search reported a post of his on the Israeli strike on diplomatic targets in Qatar, including "Using US-supplied weapons to attack another US ally is unacceptable. As Israel's primary benefactor, the US can & should impose accountability". The carrier is a social platform page that returns an error to us, so nothing from it is quoted. Its substance matches the essay above, which is quoted instead.
- [Position, 2026-03-23] South Dakota Standard carries his criticism of expanding American military involvement in the region and of the money spent on it.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- Nothing located as a separate position. The essay above discusses humanitarian conditions in Gaza and notes that American military aid continued while government reports stopped short of finding that assistance was being blocked.
Characterization of the conflict
- [Position, 2025-09-10] From the essay, confirmed: "Throughout this discussion, it is crucial to separate the actions of a government from the people living under that government. Benjamin Netanyahu, his cabinet, and his belligerent policies in this war are not equivalent with the Israeli people. Gaza's Hamas leaders are not equivalent with the Palestinian people." The essay works through findings by international courts and human rights organizations and applies the legal test to them.
- [Position, 2025-11-02] A guest column in The Dakota Scout on a diplomatic framework involving a pause in fighting and hostage releases, which he treats as a step forward, and on American politicians using foreign conflicts for domestic argument.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
- [Position, 2025-09-10] From the essay: he criticizes the framing of an accusation of genocide as inherently antisemitic, and criticizes the executive order sanctioning the International Criminal Court after it issued arrest warrants for Israeli officials.
- A separate report about this Senate race records that he posted a graphic in February 2026 about finance and technology political action committees funding the incumbent; nothing in it touches this subject.
Safety and antisemitism (context)
- [Position, 2025-09-10] From the essay, confirmed: "Indeed, I will likely be accused of antisemitism for negative commentary about Israel's actions." He argues in the same passage that criticism of a government's conduct is not prejudice against a people, and invites readers to reply with where he has the facts or the law wrong.
Race and status context
- Independent candidate for the U.S. Senate in South Dakota, on the general-election ballot with the incumbent and the Democratic nominee, per Ballotpedia's race page and his Ballotpedia profile. His name is on the Secretary of State's candidate list.
- [Position, read 2026-08-17] Campaign site home page: biography, Navy and Air Force service, work as a park ranger, and a values quiz. His long-form writing lives on the campaign publication linked above.
- His tracked vote cells are all not-in-office.
Also in this race: Julian C Beaudion (Democrat), Mike Rounds (Republican) · All South Dakota candidates.
See the full record →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open the interactive card for votes, funding and contact details.