But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Kristin Hook

Democrat · U.S. House, Texas District 21
✓
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: Asked whether she supports ending U.S. military aid to countries with ongoing abuses including Israel, she answered yes and backed withholding military aid from those harming civilians, a suspension with nothing pointing the other way. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-01. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Asked whether she supports ending U.S. military aid to countries with ongoing human rights abuses, including Israel, Hook answered yes, backing "withholding support – including funding and military aid – from those violating international law and harming civilians".

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Hook is a scientist, former educator and federal policy expert, and the Democratic nominee in Texas’s 21st District.

Her one located statement on this question is a candidate questionnaire published January 25, 2026. She was asked whether she supported ending U.S. military aid to countries with ongoing human rights abuses, naming Israel and Egypt, and an initial search records her answer as yes, with support for full investigations and oversight into countries committing human rights abuses and for withholding support, including funding and military aid, from those violating international law and harming civilians.

That is a conditional position rather than a position about Israel as such: the condition is the conduct, and Israel is one of two countries the question named. The card is worded to that limit.

Her answer is quoted directly. An earlier check reported the page as paywalled; that was wrong, and the fault was ours rather than the host’s: our first reading of the page lost the article body. The text sits on the pagerved HTML and was read in full on 2026-08-11.

An initial search found nothing else. It records no statement from her characterising the conflict, none on lobbying, and on her platform only a broad heading, "Foreign Affairs: Defending Human Rights". Before running for Congress she posted a personal reflection on a Holocaust survivor’s testimony, writing that "never again cannot just mean ‘never again the Holocaust’"; that is context rather than a position on what America sends, and it predates her candidacy.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • 2026-01-25 [Current position; VERIFIED 2026-08-11]: In a candidate questionnaire published by Lone Star Left, "Meet The Candidates: Dr. Kristin Hook For Texas Congressional District 21", she was asked whether she supported ending U.S. military aid to countries with ongoing human rights abuses, including Israel and Egypt. An initial search records her answer as: "Yes. I support full investigations and oversight into countries committing human rights abuses and withholding support, including funding and military aid, from those violating international law and harming civilians."

⚠ **AN EARLIER CHECK CALLED THIS PAGE PAYWALLED. IT IS NOT.** The article body is in the page itself; our first reading of it lost the body, so a readable page looked like a subscription notice. Read again in full on 2026-08-11, and her answer is quoted verbatim above. ⚠ **THE CONDITION IS THE CONDUCT, NOT THE COUNTRY.** The question named Israel and Egypt and asked about countries with ongoing human rights abuses generally. Her answer is about violators of international law. Rendering it as "opposes U.S. military aid to Israel" would state something narrower and firmer than she said.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located, in either direction.

Characterization of the conflict

  • An initial search’s own verdict: "There are no recorded public statements, published positions, or detailed characterizations regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict by Kristin Hook in publicly available media reports or campaign materials."

Rhetoric and lobbying

  • An initial search’s own verdict: nothing located on Israel-related rhetoric or lobbying. Her platform lists a broad heading, "Foreign Affairs: Defending Human Rights", without Israel-specific content.

Safety and antisemitism

  • 2023-01-19 [Earlier record; context only, never the answer to what America sends]: Before running for Congress she posted a personal reflection on a Holocaust survivor's testimony, writing that the phrase "never again cannot just mean 'never again the Holocaust'" and reflecting on how state power and public indifference enabled historical atrocities. An initial search cites a Facebook post and supplies no url. Predates her candidacy and is not a policy position.
  • Beyond that, an initial search records no policy position or campaign statement from her on antisemitism or Jewish community safety.

Sources consulted and read

What came back empty or unusable

  • Her only in-scope statement sits behind a paywall, so it cannot be quoted.
  • No url at all was supplied for the Holocaust reflection post.
  • Three of the four questions returned explicit not-found verdicts.

Also in this race

  1. ? Mark Teixeira (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.