But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Shannon L. Taylor
Democrat · U.S. House, Virginia District 1
?Mixed
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: Asked about an arms embargo on Israel she answered only that U.S. military aid must be used consistent with international law and civilian protection, a conditions statement that neither ends nor endorses the aid. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-01. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.
Asked in writing about an arms embargo on the government of Israel, Taylor did not directly answer, saying: "U.S. military aid must be used responsibly, consistent with American values, international law, and the protection of civilian lives." Asked about Palestine at a September rally, she declined to state her stance.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
Shannon Taylor, Henrico County's commonwealth's attorney, is the Democratic nominee for Virginia's 1st District, running against Rep. Rob Wittman.
When Cardinal News reported on its primary questionnaire in July 2026, it sorted the district's Democrats by whether they support an arms embargo on the government of Israel. It reported that Taylor "did not directly answer the question" and quoted part of her reply: "U.S. military aid must be used responsibly, consistent with American values, international law, and the protection of civilian lives." That sets a standard for aid. It does not say whether she would send it, condition it or withhold it.
At a campaign rally at the College of William and Mary on September 22, 2026, an audience question asked what she would do to end the violence in Palestine and whether she would visit Gaza or the West Bank. The Flat Hat, the college's student newspaper, reported that she declined to state her stance. She said: "I don’t want to get into any particular rhetoric for this evening because in order to solve these issues, it requires having people at the table that I personally don’t want to alienate". Later in the same answer she said: "I want to be part of a conversation that will end this war, and I want to be part of a conversation that respects the Palestinian people with Israelis". Her campaign did not respond when the paper asked it to clarify her stance.
If you want a direct answer, you are better placed to get one than we are. Ask Taylor directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in her own words.
The money
Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found
2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
In their words
“U.S. military aid must be used responsibly, consistent with American values, international law, and the protection of civilian lives.”
“I don’t want to get into any particular rhetoric for this evening because in order to solve these issues, it requires having people at the table that I personally don’t want to alienate”
“I want to be part of a conversation that will end this war, and I want to be part of a conversation that respects the Palestinian people with Israelis”
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
[Position, 2026-07-29] Cardinal News reported her answer to its primary questionnaire under the heading "Democrats are divided about an arms embargo against Israel". It wrote that "Shannon Taylor, the presumed front-runner, did not directly answer the question", and quoted part of her reply: "U.S. military aid must be used responsibly, consistent with American values, international law, and the protection of civilian lives."
[Position, 2026-09-22] At a campaign rally at the College of William and Mary on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, an audience question, submitted in advance and read out by a student organizer, asked what she would do to end the ongoing violence in Palestine and whether she planned to visit the Gaza Strip or the occupied West Bank if elected. The Flat Hat reported on September 25 that she "declined to state her stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict or whether she would visit the Gaza Strip or the occupied West Bank", and quoted her: "I don’t want to get into any particular rhetoric for this evening because in order to solve these issues, it requires having people at the table that I personally don’t want to alienate". The paper reported that she said she believes in a foreign policy that supports peace in the Middle East, and quoted her again: "I want to be part of a conversation that will end this war, and I want to be part of a conversation that respects the Palestinian people with Israelis". It asked her campaign to clarify her stance and received no response. The student organizer told the paper the questions were chosen after discussion with her campaign, and wrote that she "didn’t commit to change on financial/military support to Israel"; those are the organizer's words, not Taylor's. Delegate Jessica Anderson also spoke at the rally; the remarks about Israel and the Iran war in the same article are Anderson's, not Taylor's.
[Read 2026-09-25] Her campaign site (home, agenda, news, endorsements and media pages) does not mention Israel, Gaza or aid to Palestinians. Its only line touching war pledges to "rein in the reckless tariffs and endless wars that are driving up the price of groceries, gas, and everyday goods." Its endorsements page lists no group that works on Israel policy.
She has no federal voting record.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
No statement or documented position found by the research.
Characterization of the conflict
Nothing located. Asked about the conflict at the September 22, 2026 rally described above, she declined to state her stance.
But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and
funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps.
Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.