But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Ben Cline

Republican · U.S. House, Virginia District 6
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Cline says he has "long stood by Israel" and co-sponsored the United States-Israel Cooperation Enhancement and Regional Security Act, which he cites for bolstering defense assistance and the Iron Dome. Nothing located on U.S. aid to Palestinians.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Cline represents Virginia's 6th District and is running for re-election.

His own House newsletter, read in full, sets out the position: "I have long stood by Israel, the only democracy and our greatest ally in the Middle East. In Congress, I have cosponsored bipartisan legislation opposing the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement and other efforts to delegitimize the state of Israel. Additionally, I cosponsored the United States-Israel Cooperation Enhancement and Regional Security Act, which seeks to make improvements to cer[tain programs]." He cited that Act in an earlier newsletter for bolstering defense assistance and supporting the Iron Dome.

The same newsletter frames it against the administration: "President Biden continues to push a foreign policy that weakens our allies and emboldens our enemies... he is also undermining relations with our close friend, Israel."

As a member of the House Appropriations Committee he said in an April 2024 interview that he and colleagues strongly support military funding to keep Israel's Iron Dome operational against missile strikes from regional adversaries. That is the appropriations connection, and it is the most directly relevant thing on his record given the committee he sits on.

Nothing was located from him on U.S. aid to Palestinians.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes · Backs 0 of 1 tracked bills to restrict weapons transfers

Committees

House Committee on Appropriations

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to send more support
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$25K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $25,000
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$25,000The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“I have long stood by Israel, the only democracy and our greatest ally in the Middle East.”
Source ↗, 2026-08-12
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, published 2026-08-12] His House newsletter, opened and confirmed word for word: "In that vein, I have long stood by Israel, the only democracy and our greatest ally in the Middle East. In Congress, I have cosponsored bipartisan legislation opposing the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement and other efforts to delegitimize the state of Israel. Additionally, I cosponsored the United States-Israel Cooperation Enhancement and Regional Security Act, which seeks to make improvements to cer[tain]..." And: "President Biden continues to push a foreign policy that weakens our allies and emboldens our enemies. Not only has he failed to stand up to Putin, which has encouraged Russian military hostilities against Ukraine, but he is also undermining relations with our close friend, Israel."
  • [Earlier record, 2022-01-27] Highlighted his co-sponsorship of the United States-Israel Cooperation Enhancement and Regional Security Act, noting measures to bolster defense assistance and support the Iron Dome (a second newsletter, not opened).
  • [Position, 2024-04-26] In a broadcast interview about campus demonstrations, said he and fellow members of the House Appropriations Committee strongly support military funding to keep Israel's Iron Dome operational, as reported (video; source not opened).
  • His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card and align with the statements above.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • No statement or documented position found by the research.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Earlier record, 2021-05] District newsletter characterizing Hamas as an "Iranian-funded terror group" holding thousands of rockets and mortars in Gaza, as reported.
  • [After October 7, 2023-10-07] Statement on X that the United States stands with Israel and that Israel has an inherent right to defend itself. From the weeks right after October 7.
  • [Earlier record, 2019-08-29] In a radio interview said he supported a multi-state solution in the region guaranteeing security for Israel, as reported.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Position, published 2026-08-12] Co-sponsorship of anti-BDS legislation, in his own words above. Anti-boycott material is outside what this project tracks on cards; recorded here.
  • ⚠ Two advocacy-tracker pages were returned among his sources: Reverse Canary Mission and ClineWatch. Advocacy and watchlist sources stay visible as what the research consulted and never carry a card. Nothing is drawn from either.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing distinct located.

Consulted

Also in this race

  1. ? Beth Macy (Democrat)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.