But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Steve Womack

Republican · U.S. House, Arkansas District 3
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Womack voted for the Israel aid bills and against cutting that aid; when shipments were paused in 2024 he backed the bill forcing their release: "Withholding weapons from Israel abandons our greatest ally in the Middle East as they fight for survival." Nothing located has him addressing aid to Palestinians.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Womack represents Arkansas’s 3rd District, the state’s northwest corner, and is the sitting member and a senior appropriator.

His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card, all on the support side, including votes against both amendments to cut aid to Israel. When the administration paused certain weapons shipments in May 2024, he co-sponsored the measure to force their release, and his release said: "Withholding weapons from Israel abandons our greatest ally in the Middle East as they fight for survival. It emboldens murderous terrorists and postures America as weak and unreliable."

His support predates this war: the research records a 2021 letter urging no conditions on aid and 2021 floor remarks for Iron Dome funding, both on the research page in their own band, along with his welcome of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s July 2024 address, reported by Little Rock public radio.

Nothing located has him addressing U.S. humanitarian aid for Palestinians at any date. His statements from the weeks after the October 2023 attack are on the research page.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Committees

House Committee on Appropriations

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$28K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $27,900
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$27,900The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“Withholding weapons from Israel abandons our greatest ally in the Middle East as they fight for survival. It emboldens murderous terrorists and postures America as weak and unreliable.”
Source ↗, 2024-05-16
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card, all support-side; the grounding for each sits in the record section.
  • [Position, 2024-05-16] His release on the shipment-release bill, quoted on the card; verified against his own site (the page titles him a co-sponsor and carries the full statement).
  • [Position, 2024-04-20, reported] Floor remarks on the April 2024 package ("America is safer when our allies and partners are safe", with a note that funded munitions are made in Arkansas) are our research; the release page retrieved for them carries a different statement, so the floor wording is not quoted on the card.
  • [Prior, 2021-05-20] A letter urging the administration to put no conditions on aid, per our research. Prior band.
  • [Prior, 2021-09-23] Floor remarks for Iron Dome supplemental funding ("has no offensive capability"). Prior band; defensive-systems detail stays off the front.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-11-02] Original co-sponsorship of H.R. 6126 with a statement calling the aid "the most important thing we can do right now for Israel and our national security", per our research. Not on the card summary.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located at any date.

Characterization of the conflict

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Tracked funding totals appear as a badge on this card.
  • Three YouTube addresses were offered and not watched; nothing claimed from them. It is not yet confirmed.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing located in the position band.

Race and status context

  • Sitting member, nominated. His Democratic challenger’s card carries its own record.

Also in this race

  1. ✓ Robb Ryerse (Democrat)
  2. – Bobby Wilson (Libertarian)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.