Sandra Van Scotter
In a 2026 candidate survey Van Scotter opposed unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel: "unconditional support has enabled actions" the U.S. "would not tolerate from other allies," and "blind loyalty is not an alliance; it is an enabler." She also called Israel a democratic ally and said the relationship matters.
In her 2026 candidate survey answers on iVoterGuide, Van Scotter affirmed that the U.S.-Israel relationship is important ("Yes — strategically, historically, and as a democratic ally in a volatile region") and in the same answer wrote that "the U.S. has a documented blind spot regarding Israel's human rights record in Gaza and the occupied territories," that "unconditional support has enabled actions — including the attack on Iran — that the U.S. would not tolerate from other allies," and that "true partnership requires honest accountability. Blind loyalty is not an alliance; it is an enabler." She also answered yes that "violent jihadist extremism poses a real threat to U.S. national security."
An April 6, 2026 post on her campaign Facebook page reportedly called her the only pro-ceasefire candidate in the race and worried that public anger over Gaza was turning into apathy; the post URL would not open, so that item is research-page-only pending verification.
Her ActBlue page pledges: "We do NOT accept money from corporations, AIPAC, Political Action Committees (PACs), Big Oil, Big Pharma or Data Centers." That is a decision about campaign money sources; it is not a position on U.S. weapons or funding to the government of Israel or on aid to Palestinians.
Research
Identity: Sandra Van Scotter (D), CA-20 candidate, 2026. Ballotpedia; Wikipedia 2026 CA House elections page (does not name her per the first search).
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- 2026 [Current position; survey page undated; verified]: Survey answers: affirmed the U.S.-Israel relationship ("Yes — strategically, historically, and as a democratic ally in a volatile region") and wrote "the U.S. has a documented blind spot regarding Israel's human rights record in Gaza and the occupied territories"; "Unconditional support has enabled actions — including the attack on Iran — that the U.S. would not tolerate from other allies"; "True partnership requires honest accountability. Blind loyalty is not an alliance; it is an enabler." iVoterGuide. The first search labeled this her "Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey," but the cited and verified page is iVoterGuide; Ballotpedia itself blocked opening (robots).
Characterization of the conflict
- 2026-04-06 [Current position; SOURCE DID NOT OPEN, cannot be used on the card]: Campaign Facebook post reportedly calling her "the only pro-ceasefire candidate in the race" and expressing concern that public anger over Gaza was becoming political apathy. Source is a Facebook group post that would not open (unlinked per source rule); pending verification.
- 2026 [Current position; survey; verified]: Characterized Israel's actions in Gaza and the occupied territories as raising significant human rights concerns; answered "Yes, violent jihadist extremism poses a real threat to U.S. national security." iVoterGuide.
Rhetoric and lobbying
- 2026 [Current position; undated fundraising page]: Campaign pledge: "We do NOT accept money from corporations, AIPAC, Political Action Committees (PACs), Big Oil, Big Pharma or Data Centers." ActBlue. A funding-source refusal; must not be read as a weapons/funding position.
Safety and antisemitism
- No statements, platform entries, or actions found. [Nothing found]
Also in this race: Vince Fong (Republican) · All California candidates.
See the full record →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open the interactive card for votes, funding and contact details.