But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Robb Tucker

Republican · U.S. House, California District 3
–
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

Tucker has not spoken publicly on U.S. military aid to Israel or U.S. aid to Palestinians; no statements found in source-checked research. A June 2026 race analysis by Indivisible El Dorado found he had published no standalone foreign policy platform, focusing on district and domestic issues.

✉  Email the campaignWebsite ↗Facebook ↗

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

We found no statement from Robb Tucker on U.S. military aid or weapons to Israel, U.S. aid to Palestinians, or the conflict itself. Tucker is a Nevada County supervisor and the Republican candidate for the U.S. House in California's 3rd district, per Ballotpedia and his campaign launch coverage.

A race analysis prepared June 29, 2026 by Indivisible El Dorado, an advocacy group, describes him as aligned with the general Republican platform on a strong U.S.-Israel alliance and an America First, Peace Through Strength lens, while noting he had published no detailed foreign policy platform. That is the group's characterization, not a statement by Tucker.

One claim found failed verification: that at the March 25, 2025 Board of Supervisors meeting he abstained on a measure tied to a Gaza ceasefire and arms-embargo resolution. The Sierra Thread report shows his abstention and his purview and decorum objections concerned a resolution on preserving federal funding for local services; public commenters raised Gaza, but Tucker is not quoted on it.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • No statement or documented position found. [Nothing found]
  • 2026-06-29 [Current position; advocacy analysis, not the candidate's words]: Indivisible El Dorado's CA-3 matrix says Tucker aligns with the general Republican platform on a strong U.S.-Israel alliance and an "America First" / "Peace Through Strength" lens, and had published no standalone foreign policy platform.

Characterization of the conflict

  • 2025-03-25 [Current position; verification failed, corrected]: An initial search claimed Tucker abstained on a local measure related to a Gaza ceasefire and arms-embargo resolution and called Middle East resolutions outside the board's purview. Verification against the Sierra Thread article shows the abstention and the "not within the Board's purview... contrary to the Board's decorum policy" remarks concerned a resolution urging Congress to preserve federal funding for local services. Public commenters urged a ceasefire/arms-embargo resolution at that meeting; the article contains no Tucker remarks on Gaza. Not usable as an Israel/Palestine item.

Rhetoric and lobbying

  • No Israel-related record found. At the same 2025-03-25 meeting Tucker noted the county pays lobbying firms to advocate for local taxpayer dollars in Washington; per the verified source this was about federal funding advocacy, not foreign policy. Sierra Thread. [Empty of in-scope material]

Safety and antisemitism

  • No public statements, campaign materials, or actions found. [Nothing found]

Sources consulted

Also in this race

  1. ? Ami Bera (Democrat)

All California candidates.

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.