But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Jasmine Clark
Democrat · U.S. House, Georgia District 13
–No Position Found
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
Clark has not spoken publicly on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. No statement was found in source-checked research across 7 sources.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
7 sources checked and resolved, every one listed on the research page. Most candidates at this level have simply never been asked.
You are better placed to change that than we are. Ask Clark directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in their own words, which is worth more than anything we could write about them.
The money
Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found
2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
What was looked for, and what came back
**U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There is no public record of Jasmine Clark making personal statements or taking public actions regarding U.S. military aid, foreign assistance packages, or weapons transfers to Israel.
**Characterization of the conflict:** There is no public record of Jasmine Clark making personal statements characterising the broader Israel/Palestine conflict itself (such as offering formal characterizations of the war in Gaza, Hamas, or Israeli military operations).
**Rhetoric and lobbying:** Material returned; set out in full below.
**Safety and antisemitism:** Material returned; set out in full below.
What else came back
The card's claim is about what the United States sends, and no position was found there. These sections returned material beyond a bare verdict. It is reproduced word for word so nothing found is lost; none of it is a position on U.S. weapons or money. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.
### Rhetoric and lobbying While Jasmine Clark has not made public statements directly addressing pro-Israel lobbying groups or political action committees, she has addressed political rhetoric and speech protections relating to Israel in the context of state legislation:
* **March 6, 2023:** During floor debate in the Georgia House of Representatives regarding House Bill 30 (which proposed incorporating the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism into state law), Clark expressed concern that adopting broad working definitions into state statute could be weaponized to censor political speech or equate certain criticism of Israel with antisemitism.
*
### Safety and antisemitism Jasmine Clark has addressed public safety and antisemitism primarily through her floor remarks in the Georgia General Assembly:
* **March 6, 2023:** On the floor of the Georgia House of Representatives, Clark condemned antisemitic acts, stating, "There's no place for hate in our beautiful, diverse state," and emphasizing that there is no excuse for antisemitism. * **March 6, 2023:** During the same legislative debate, Clark argued that antisemitic crimes were already covered under Georgia’s existing 2020 hate crimes statute. She raised concerns about creating a specialized statutory definition for antisemitism when Georgia code lacked specific definitions for hate crimes targeting other marginalized groups, noting that Black, Latino, and Asian American communities could similarly point to rising acts of violence. * **March 6, 2023:** Clarifying her position on the floor, Clark stated: "Just because I vote no on this bill does not mean I am making a vote against Jewish people. I support the Jewish community. However, I also oppose referencing non-legally binding working definitions in Georgia code".
*
Sources consulted and resolved (7)
19thnews.org [does not name the candidate in retrievable text]
But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and
funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps.
Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.