But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Frank Mrvan
- Backed with $28K by PACs we track that support U.S. weapons funding for the government of Israel (lifetime)
- Endorsed by AIPAC
- Sits on House Appropriations
Mrvan’s votes split across the 2023-24 bills but he backed the April 2024 package, telling the House it would “aid in the defense of our ally Israel” and “address the dire need for humanitarian assistance for the people of Gaza”. He voted against both amendments to cut aid to Israel.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
You asked Frank Mrvan where they stand.
Deep Dive
Mrvan represents Indiana’s 1st District, the state’s industrial northwest, and is the sitting member.
His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card: against the November 2023 standalone bill, for the February and April 2024 bills, against the May 2024 shipment-release bill, and against both amendments to cut aid to Israel. His April 2024 floor statement carries both dimensions in one passage: the package would "aid in the defense of our ally Israel" (the replenishment specifics stay on the research page) and "includes $9 billion to address the dire need for humanitarian assistance for the people of Gaza".
At a January 2024 forum he backed the administration’s supplemental request covering Israel, Ukraine and Gaza humanitarian aid. Nothing located explains his November 2023 or May 2024 No votes in his own words, and this card does not guess.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 4 of 6 tracked votes
House Committee on Appropriations
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 4 of 6 tracked votes.)
The money
$28K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
In their words
AIPAC (2026 endorsement)
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- His recorded votes appear as badges on this card and split as the front states; the grounding for each sits in the record section. No explanation of the two No votes was located; the badges stand unexplained.
- [Position, 2024-04-20] His floor statement, verified: the ally-defense clause, the Iron Dome and David’s Sling replenishment naming (defensive-systems detail, kept here), and the $9 billion Gaza humanitarian passage.
- [Position, 2024-01-30] His forum support for the supplemental, his office’s in-the-news repost.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- The $9 billion humanitarian passage above is his stated position; quoted on the card.
Characterization of the conflict
- [Position] His statement on recent violence exists on his site; dates checked at capture, nothing quoted.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
- Tracked funding totals appear as a badge on this card.
- An adversary tracker (Reverse Canary Mission) keeps a page on him; nothing adopted.
Safety and antisemitism (context)
- A 2021 bipartisan antisemitism item appears via colleagues’ pages; prior band, nothing quoted.
Race and status context
- Sitting member, nominated. His Republican challenger’s card carries its own record.
Also in this race
- –No Position Found Barb Regnitz (Republican)
All Indiana candidates.
See everyone on the Indiana ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.