But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Jefferson Shreve

Republican · U.S. House, Indiana District 6
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 2 tracked votes

Shreve backs supply without troops: "I support sending military aid and weapons to Israel, but not U.S. troops. Israel has enough good soldiers." He voted against both amendments cutting that aid, has a bill to end U.S. funding for the UN’s Lebanon peacekeeping mission, and co-led a terrorist-designation push.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Shreve represents Indiana’s 6th District, elected in 2024.

His fullest statement came as a candidate in April 2024, to a local primary forum report: "I’m a strong supporter of defending our allies, which Israel is one. I support sending military aid and weapons to Israel, but not U.S. troops. Israel has enough good soldiers. If we give them the supplies that they need, I think we can leave them alone. This business of trying to get in and intervene and force a new election in Israel is way out of line in my book." His two recorded votes on the tracked bills, against both amendments to cut aid to Israel, appear as badges on this card.

In office he has worked the UN corner of the subject: a bill to end U.S. funding for the UNIFIL peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, and, with Representative Barr, a November 2025 letter urging the Treasury to designate the Palestinian Conference for Palestinians Abroad as a terrorist group.

Nothing located has him addressing U.S. humanitarian aid for Palestinians as a funding question.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 2 tracked votes

Committees

House Committee on Appropriations

Floor votes
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to send more support
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 2 of 2 tracked votes.)

The money

$10K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $10,000
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$10,000The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“I support sending military aid and weapons to Israel, but not U.S. troops. Israel has enough good soldiers.”
Source ↗, 2024-04-09
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • His recorded votes appear as badges on this card: No on both amendments to cut aid to Israel; he took office in January 2025, after the 2024 packages.
  • [Position, 2024-04-09] The primary-forum interview, verified verbatim, quoted on the card including his objection to pressuring Israel’s internal politics.
  • [Position, 2025] His UNIFIL defunding bill, his own release, verified: ends U.S. funding for the UN’s Lebanon mission, which the Security Council has directed to cease operations at the end of 2026. The research’s slug suggested a different UN target; the page shows UNIFIL, and the card says UNIFIL.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located as a funding question.

Characterization of the conflict

  • Nothing located in the position band beyond the material above.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Position, 2025-11] The Barr-Shreve designation letter, verified via Jewish Insider: urging Treasury to designate the Palestinian Conference for Palestinians Abroad as a terrorist group.
  • Tracked funding totals appear as a badge on this card. Video and Facebook sources were offered and not watched or do not open; nothing claimed from them.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • A UN special-rapporteur dismissal demand appears via an advocacy site naming many lawmakers; dates checked, nothing quoted.

Race and status context

  • Sitting member, nominated. His Democratic challenger’s card carries its own record.

Also in this race

  1. ? Cinde Wirth (Democrat)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.