But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Cinde Wirth

Democrat · U.S. House, Indiana District 6
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: At a September 2024 voter forum she says "We should continue our support of Israel", but that we need to "keep in mind that there is a humanitarian aspect", which points both ways. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Wirth backs support with a humanitarian caveat: "We should continue our support of Israel, but we need to keep in mind that there is a humanitarian aspect." A 2026 comment reportedly opposing unconditional military assistance is on the research page, unconfirmed.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Wirth is the Democratic nominee in Indiana’s 6th District, a scientist making her third run at the seat.

At a September 2024 League of Women Voters forum, as reported locally, she said: "We should continue our support of Israel, but we need to keep in mind that there is a humanitarian aspect." The research also handed her a second sentence from that forum (about allies and not pursuing peaceful options enough) which the page attributes to a different candidate; it was cut here and recorded as a wrong-person attribution.

In March 2026 she is reported to have written, in a community-group discussion, that U.S. policy should not give unconditional military assistance; the source is a Facebook group post that does not open, so the wording is as our research recorded it, kept on the research page, unconfirmed.

Her campaign site carries no Israel, Gaza, aid or lobbying content. Nothing located has her addressing U.S. aid to Palestinians as a funding question.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“We should continue our support of Israel, but we need to keep in mind that there is a humanitarian aspect.”
Source ↗, 2024-09-25

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2024-09-25] The League forum report, verified: her support-with-humanitarian-aspect sentence, quoted on the card.
  • [Wrong-person catch] The research attributed to her a second forum sentence ("Israel is our ally, we need to take care of our allies, but I don’t believe we’ve pursued peaceful options enough"); the page attributes it to candidate Sceniak. Excluded from her card entirely.
  • [Position, 2026-03, unopenable source] Her reported community-group comment that "U.S. policy should not gi[ve]" unconditional military assistance; a Facebook group post that does not open; our research. It is not yet confirmed.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located as a funding question; her humanitarian caveat above is the nearest material.

Characterization of the conflict

  • Nothing further located.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Nothing located. No tracked funding badge appears because no committee support is recorded for her.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing located.

Where the absence was checked

  • [Consulted, read 2026-08-22] Her campaign site opens and carries no Israel, Gaza, aid or lobbying content.
  • [Consulted] Her Ballotpedia profile and primary-win coverage; a candidate-survey profile was offered and it could not be retrieved at writing time.

Race and status context

  • Democratic nominee facing the sitting member, whose card carries its own record. She has held no office, so there are no recorded votes on this card.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Jefferson Shreve (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.