But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Roger Marshall

Republican · U.S. Senate, Kansas
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 9 of 10 tracked votes

Marshall accused President Biden of "blocking aid to Israel" when a 2024 ammunition shipment was held. He voted against every Senate resolution to block a U.S. arms sale to the government of Israel, and against the 2024 package pairing that aid with Ukraine's after pressing for standalone aid.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Marshall is Kansas' junior senator and is running for another term. His votes point one way on the arms-sale question: every time the Senate was asked whether to take up a resolution disapproving a specific weapons sale to the government of Israel, he voted no, which was a vote against blocking the sale. The sales were 120-millimeter tank rounds, high-explosive mortar rounds and JDAM bomb guidance kits in November 2024, roughly $8.8 billion of bombs and guidance kits in April 2025 including $2.04 billion of 2,000-pound bombs, 1,000-pound bombs with JDAM kits and automatic rifles in July 2025, and armored bulldozers and 1,000-pound bombs in April 2026.

One vote of his does not fit that pattern. On the 2024 supplemental that combined military aid for the government of Israel with aid for Ukraine and Taiwan, he voted no, against a bill a large bipartisan majority passed. Eight days earlier, he had asked the Senate for standalone aid instead, urging it to pass "the bipartisan House passed Israel aid bill" and saying: "As for me and my family and my colleagues, we choose Israel."

In May 2024, after reports that the administration had put an ammunition shipment on hold ahead of the Rafah operation, he wrote to President Biden demanding an explanation. In the letter he wrote that "You and your Administration have repeatedly abandoned Israel" and that "I believe the world should know exactly where you stand with Israel", and he asked whether it had been rerouted to Ukraine. Newsweek quoted his post afterwards: "Catering to his pro-terrorist, pro-Hamas faction of his party, Joe Biden is blocking aid to Israel. We are demanding answers."

On U.S. money for Palestinians, the one statement in his own words is from 2021: at a Capitol press conference he counted "hundreds of millions of dollars" handed out to Palestinians among the signals he said had emboldened Hamas and Iran. In September 2024 he signed a group letter to President Biden that faulted the administration for "restoring funding to the Palestinian Authority and the Hamas accomplices in UNRWA". If you want his current position on that, you are better placed to get it than we are: ask Marshall directly and send us the reply. It goes on this page in his own words.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 9 of 10 tracked votes

Floor votes
H.R. 815 - National Security Supplemental2024-04-23 · Passed 79-18 (Senate)
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
S.J.Res. 111 - disapproving sale of 120mm tank rounds to Israel2024-11-20 · Failed 18-79
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 113 - disapproving sale of 120mm high-explosive mortar rounds to Israel2024-11-20 · Failed 19-78
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 115 - disapproving sale of JDAM bomb guidance kits to Israel2024-11-20 · Failed 17-80
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 26 - disapproving $6.75B sale of bombs and guidance kits to Israel2025-04-03 · Failed 15-83
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 33 - disapproving $2.04B sale of 2,000-lb bombs to Israel2025-04-03 · Failed 15-82
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 34 - disapproving $675.7M sale of 1,000-lb bombs and JDAM kits to Israel2025-07-30 · Failed 24-73
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 41 - disapproving sale of fully automatic assault rifles to Israel2025-07-30 · Motion to Discharge Rejected 27-70
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 32 - disapproving $295M sale of D9 Caterpillar armored bulldozers to Israel2026-04-15 · Failed 40-59
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
S.J.Res. 138 - disapproving $151.8M sale of 1,000-lb bombs to Israel2026-04-15 · Failed 36-63
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
S. 554 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Senate companion to H.R. 1229.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 9 of 10 tracked votes.)

The money

$10K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $5,000 · Republican Jewish Coalition: $5,000
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$5,000The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Republican Jewish Coalition$5,000The Republican Jewish Coalition's PAC; it financially supports Republican candidates who reflect its priorities, including strong U.S. backing of the government of Israel.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“Catering to his pro-terrorist, pro-Hamas faction of his party, Joe Biden is blocking aid to Israel. We are demanding answers.”
Source ↗, 2024-05-07
“So today, we’re here once again offering an olive branch to pass the bipartisan House passed Israel aid bill that can be signed by the President tonight. The House has passed it, we could pass this, the President can sign it tonight and get that aid to Israel. It’s time to show where America stands. Is it with Iran and Hamas? Or is it with Israel? It has to be one or the other. You can’t choose both. As for me and my family and my colleagues, we choose Israel.”
Source ↗, 2024-04-15
“You and your Administration have repeatedly abandoned Israel. Should you have unilaterally decided to divert aid to our greatest ally in the Middle East, Israel, then you should come forward and defend this decision. I believe the world should know exactly where you stand with Israel”
Source ↗, 2024-05-06
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2024-04-15] On the Senate floor, eight days before the vote on the combined package, he called for immediate passage of standalone aid for the government of Israel by unanimous consent, with Senator Marsha Blackburn; his office's release says Senate Democrats blocked it. Verified verbatim from the release: "A friend in need is a friend indeed. So today, we’re here once again offering an olive branch to pass the bipartisan House passed Israel aid bill that can be signed by the President tonight. ... It’s time to show where America stands. Is it with Iran and Hamas? Or is it with Israel? It has to be one or the other. You can’t choose both. As for me and my family and my colleagues, we choose Israel."
  • [Position, 2024-05-07] Letter to the president after an ammunition shipment to the Israel Defense Forces was held ahead of the Rafah operation, reported by Newsweek, which read the letter. Verified verbatim as the outlet quotes them: he wrote that the president had "repeatedly abandoned Israel" and "I believe the world should know exactly where you stand with Israel." The report records that he asked whether further shipments would be blocked and whether this one was to be rerouted to Ukraine, and quotes his post afterwards: "Catering to his pro-terrorist, pro-Hamas faction of his party, Joe Biden is blocking aid to Israel. We are demanding answers." His office published passages from the letter on 2024-05-06, and both sentences are in them, as is his question "Did your Administration reroute this ammunition shipment from Israel to Ukraine?"
  • [Position, 2024-08-02] He signed a Senate Republican letter led by Senator Tom Cotton that protested "your administration’s partial arms embargo against Israel", named his May 6, 2024 letter among the inquiries it said the administration had ignored, and asked: "We urge you to use every available emergency authority to expedite the physical delivery of all weapons and ammunition to Israel that have been approved by Congress." It is a group letter, so the words are the signers' jointly, not his alone.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-26] He introduced the Israel Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2023 with three colleagues, a standalone $14.3 billion bill, on his own Senate press site. The release states the bill "ensures that funding for Israel is not coupled with billions of additional dollars in aid to Ukraine" and blocks the administration "from leveraging aid to Israel for more Ukraine funding". His own words, verified verbatim: "My colleagues and I firmly believe that any aid to Israel should not be used as leverage to send tens of billions of dollars to Ukraine. Any package that does so would result in funds and resources being delayed in Israel's time of need." Not on the card summary, because it dates from October 2023 to January 2024.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-11-14] On the Senate floor he demanded immediate passage of the House standalone package. Not on the card summary.
  • [Position, 2024 to 2026] Ten recorded votes, cross-checked one by one against the official Senate roll-call pages, for example S.J.Res. 111 and S.J.Res. 138. Nine are votes against taking up resolutions that would have blocked a specific U.S. arms sale to the government of Israel. The tenth is a vote against the 2024 national security supplemental, the bill that combined military aid for the government of Israel with aid for Ukraine and Taiwan, and which passed.
  • [Position, 2026-09-25] He is not a cosponsor of S. 554, the United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025. Congress.gov's record of the bill lists 32 cosponsors, none withdrawn, and his name is not among them.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Earlier record, 2021-05-19] In a Capitol press conference published on his own Senate site, verified verbatim: "And finally, the White House has handed out hundreds of millions of dollars to Palestinians. All of these are signals to Iran and Hamas: go ahead, full speed ahead." Predates the period this site tracks. It is the only statement in his own words located on U.S. money for Palestinians.
  • [Position, 2024-09-27] He joined Senator Tom Cotton and Representative Elise Stefanik in a group letter to President Biden on Iran policy. His office's release quotes the letter: "You further empowered Iranian proxies by removing the Houthis from the list of designated terrorist organizations and restoring funding to the Palestinian Authority and the Hamas accomplices in UNRWA." The same passage calls the administration's weapons hold "a weekslong, partial arms embargo on Israel". It is a group letter, so the words are the signers' jointly, not his alone.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Earlier record, 2021-05-19] From the same remarks, verified verbatim: "Israel on the other hand, Israel is: America's long-time ally, the only democracy in the Middle East, our eyes and ears in a troubled region, portions of which plot to kill Americans." And: "Israel has every right to defend themselves and must keep defending themselves." The same passage describes Hamas at length in terms this page does not reproduce in full.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-26] "The brutal, savage attacks launched by Hamas against our closest ally in the Middle East, Israel, have sent shock waves across the world." Not on the card summary.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • American Israel Public Affairs Committee support this cycle and Republican Jewish Coalition lifetime support are badges on this card and are not restated.
  • [Position, 2024-11-13] He is a cosponsor of a bill to cut U.S. funding to any United Nations agency that restricts the government of Israel's participation. The lead sponsors' release lists him among thirty-two cosponsors. It reaches U.S. money through United Nations procedure rather than through aid itself, which is why it sits here and not on the card. A legislative news feed carries the same announcement.
  • [Position, 2024-07-30] A press briefing in which he called the administration's diplomacy on the war "empty words & very few actions". No transcript of the briefing was found, so those words are not confirmed.
  • The American Jewish Congress's political guide carried a profile of him recording his cosponsorship of anti-boycott legislation across his time in Congress. That page no longer opens (checked 2026-09-25), so the claim has no live source and nothing from it is relied on here. It was an advocacy compilation rather than a statement of his.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

Race and status context

Also in this race

  1. ? Adam Hamilton (Democrat)
  2. – David C Graham (Libertarian)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.