But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Lauren Reinhold

Democrat · U.S. House, Kansas District 1
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: In April 2026 a blog reported that her campaign said Israel "had committed war crimes" and that she would support international accountability for its leadership, while calling Israel the "only democracy in the Middle East", which points both ways. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Reinhold’s campaign, pressed by a student outlet, confirmed positions that Israel "had committed war crimes", supporting "international accountability for Israeli leadership" and a two-state solution on 1967 borders, while cautioning against blowing up long-standing deals "hastily". The outlet’s own slant is labelled on the research page.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Reinhold is the Democratic nominee in Kansas’s 1st District, an attorney and former federal-union officer who won the August 2026 primary.

Her positions come from one exchange with a University of Kansas student outlet in April 2026. At the forum itself she condemned what she called "immoral" bombing campaigns in the Iran war (Iran material that stays on the research page), and in a follow-up statement to the outlet, a representative of her campaign confirmed that Israel "had committed war crimes", that she "would support international accountability for Israeli leadership", and that she supports "a 2-state solution along 1967 borders". The same statement called Israel the "only democracy in the Middle East", cautioned that long-standing deals should not be blown up "hastily", and said candidates in the district must "be careful about the words we say".

The outlet is a left-leaning student publication whose own editorializing runs against her caution; its slant is labelled on the research page, and only the campaign-confirmed positions are used.

Nothing located has her addressing U.S. aid packages or aid to Palestinians as funding questions. Ask Reinhold directly and send us the reply: it goes on this page in her own words.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • Nothing located as a package or transfers position; her deal-caution ("blow [long-standing deals] up hastily", the outlet’s bracketed rendering) is the nearest material and is quoted with its brackets.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2026-04-20] The Weekly Rose’s interviews piece, verified: her campaign’s confirmed positions quoted on the card (war crimes, accountability, two-state on 1967 borders, only-democracy, careful-words). Basis: a campaign representative’s statements to a left-leaning student outlet whose own commentary (e.g., calling her caution "conciliatory... to zionist colonialism") is the outlet’s and is not adopted.
  • [Position, 2026-04, Iran material] At the forum she condemned "immoral" bombing campaigns and said "letting Israel order us to go to war" is wrong, spoken in the Iran-war context, verified on the same page; Iran material stays off the front of the card.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Nothing located. No tracked funding badge appears because no committee support is recorded for her.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing located.

Where the absence was checked

  • [Consulted] Her Ballotpedia profile; an aggregator page this project does not cite and a video we have not watched were offered; nothing claimed from either.

Race and status context

  • Democratic nominee in a three-way general election against the sitting member. She has held no office, so there are no recorded votes on this card.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Tracey Mann (Republican)
  2. – Steven Jacob (Libertarian)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.