But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
James Comer
- Backed with $23K by PACs we track that support U.S. weapons funding for the government of Israel (lifetime)
- Endorsed by AIPAC
Comer voted for every Israel aid bill and against both amendments to cut that aid. After a 2017 delegation he backed continued military assistance while concluding that U.S. assistance to the West Bank and Gaza "is ineffective and should be eliminated".
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
You asked James Comer where they stand.
Deep Dive
Comer represents Kentucky’s 1st District, is the sitting member, and chairs the House Oversight Committee.
His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card, all on the support side, including votes against both amendments to cut aid to Israel. His aid-to-Palestinians position is old but explicit: after a 2017 delegation to the region, his statement said that "after hearing the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) presentation to our delegation, I became convinced that U.S. assistance to the West Bank and Gaza is ineffective and should be eliminated", quoted to its verified span, prior band but never walked back in anything located.
In 2021 he stood "with the people of Israel" during that year’s escalation. His Oversight committee work touching this subject is on the research page.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)
The money
$23K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
In their words
AIPAC (2026 endorsement)
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- His recorded votes appear as badges on this card, all support-side; the grounding for each sits in the record section.
- [Prior, 2017-10-03] The delegation statement, verified: continued military assistance to counter regional threats, and the eliminate-PA-assistance conclusion quoted on the card. Prior band, never contradicted in anything located.
- [Reaction window, 2023-10-23] The Comer-Greene DOD letter, verified: an oversight probe into aid and weapons distribution. In-window; the card cites it as committee action without quoting.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- The 2017 eliminate conclusion above is his explicit position; nothing located updates it in the position band.
Characterization of the conflict
- [Prior, 2021-05] His stand-with-the-people-of-Israel statement, verified by title. Prior band.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
- [Position, ongoing] The American Muslims for Palestine investigation, verified: the committee’s framing ("funding of illegal, pro-Hamas activities") is quoted as the committee’s. Companion Oversight items (university probes, disinformation hearings) appear across his committee releases; dates checked.
- Tracked funding totals appear as a badge on this card.
Safety and antisemitism (context)
- His committee’s campus investigations with Representatives Foxx and Stefanik; committee actions, listed as such.
Race and status context
- Sitting member and committee chairman, nominated. His Democratic challenger’s card carries its own record.
Also in this race
- –No Position Found Drew Williams (Democrat)
All Kentucky candidates.
See everyone on the Kentucky ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.