But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Erik Osberg

Democrat · U.S. House, Minnesota District 7
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: At a campaign stop reported in November 2025 he pledged that as a congressional candidate he "will not take AIPAC money", without saying where he stands on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Osberg pledged at a campaign stop: “just know that me as a congressional candidate, will not take AIPAC money”, adding he would use his influence to “put us in the right direction”. A conditional-aid platform is also reported for him; it is on the research page, unconfirmed.

✉  Copy a message to send them

We don’t have a campaign email on file yet. Copy this message and send it through their website or a public social account.

If you send this from your own email, cc replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org so we can post their answer.

Deep Dive

Osberg is the DFL nominee in Minnesota’s 7th District, challenging Rep. Michelle Fischbach.

His verified statement came at his hundredth campaign stop in Warroad, per KQ92’s report: after constituents raised Israel investments and the ethics of taxpayer allocations, he pledged his campaign would be free of corporate influence, "My pledge to you as a candidate and as a gesture of good faith, just know that me as a congressional candidate, will not take AIPAC money … I would use whatever influence I have to put us in the right direction."

The research also reports platform positions, conditional military aid to Israel, war as last resort, civilian protection and humanitarian aid in Gaza, but their only carrier is an aggregator this project does not cite, so they stay out of the card summary as reported. Nothing located on antisemitism.

The card can be updated if he publishes the platform on his own channels.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-09-27) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“My pledge to you as a candidate and as a gesture of good faith, just know that me as a congressional candidate, will not take AIPAC money … I would use whatever influence I have to put us in the right direction.”
Source ↗, 2025-11-11

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Reported] The conditional-aid platform; an uncited aggregator only, so not on the card summary.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Reported] The humanitarian-aid and civilian-protection planks; same uncited carrier.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Reported] The war-as-last-resort frame; same uncited carrier.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Position, 2025-11-11] The AIPAC-money pledge, verified and quoted on the card; an organization-specific refusal.
  • No tracked committee support.

Safety and antisemitism

  • Nothing located at any date.

Sources retrieved for this card

Race and status context

  • DFL nominee against Rep. Michelle Fischbach, whose card carries its own record.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Michelle Fischbach (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.