But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Ron Eller

Republican · U.S. House, Mississippi District 2
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: Asked in a 2024 interview about a red line for U.S. support of Israel, he said "where that red line is on a conflict is really tough to say", without saying where he stands on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Asked whether a red line should exist for continued U.S. aid to Israel, Eller declined to draw one: "where that red line is on a conflict is really tough to say", adding that "in the case of Gaza and Israel, it’s going to be a tough decision".

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Eller is the Republican nominee in Mississippi’s 2nd District, a retired Army captain and physician assistant on his third run at the seat.

His one located exchange is direct: a November 2024 interview asked whether a red line should exist for continued American support (financial, political, material) given civilian deaths "often killed with American munitions specifically". He answered that "where that red line is on a conflict is really tough to say" and "in the case of Gaza and Israel, it’s going to be a tough decision", adding that the killing of Hamas’s leader might bring the war toward an end. A declined-line answer, carried as exactly that.

Nothing located has him addressing aid packages affirmatively, aid to Palestinians, lobbying organizations, or antisemitism. Ask Eller directly and send us the reply: it goes on this page in his own words.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“where that red line is on a conflict is really tough to say”
Source ↗, 2024-11-03

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2024-11-03] The Mississippi Free Press interview, verified: the interviewer’s red-line question (with its American-munitions framing, the outlet’s words) and his declined-line answers, quoted on the card. Single-outlet basis, stated.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located.

Characterization of the conflict

  • His Sinwar remark in the same interview (the killing "maybe" bringing the war to an end); verified on the page.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Nothing located. No tracked funding badge appears because no committee support is recorded for him.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nothing located.

Where the absence was checked

  • [Consulted] The interview above (his fullest public record); his campaign’s Facebook items have unopenable addresses. No campaign-site address located in the research record.

Race and status context

  • Republican nominee facing the sitting member, whose card carries its own record. He has held no office, so there are no recorded votes on this card.

Also in this race

  1. ? Bennie Thompson (Democrat)
  2. – Bennie Foster (Independent)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.