But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Bennie Thompson

Democrat · U.S. House, Mississippi District 2
?Supported sending weapons or funding in 1 of 6 tracked votes

Thompson voted against every Israel aid bill and for the 2026 amendment to cut aid to Israel, co-sponsors the bill limiting transfers of certain weapons to Israel, and appears on the tally of members who called for a ceasefire. Nothing located has him addressing U.S. aid to Palestinians as funding.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Thompson represents Mississippi’s 2nd District, is the sitting member, and is the senior Democrat on Homeland Security.

His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card and point one way on the restraint side: against every aid bill and for the 2026 Massie amendment. He co-sponsors H.R. 3565, the bill to limit transfers of certain offensive weapons to Israel pending accountability commitments, and The New Republic’s running list records him among members calling for a ceasefire.

In the war’s first week he told Mississippi Public Broadcasting the U.S. had "started moving equipment directly into Israel so that they can defend themselves, and we will continue to do that", an October 2023 statement that sits on the research page, and a reminder that his restraint-side votes came after initial support for resupply.

Nothing located has him addressing U.S. humanitarian aid for Palestinians as a distinct funding question.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 1 of 6 tracked votes · Cosponsors the Block the Bombs Act

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✓ Voted No
voted against sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✓ Voted Yes
voted to limit or block it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to restrict weapons transfers
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in some, but no more than half, of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 1 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • His recorded votes appear as badges on this card, all restraint-side; the grounding for each sits in the record section.
  • [Position, 2025-05-21] The H.R. 3565 co-sponsorship, verified on the tracker’s signatory list; the bill number stays the tracker’s.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-12] The MPB interview, verified: the moving-equipment passage. Not on the card summary as a position, carried here because it marks where he started.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located as a funding question.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2023-late] The ceasefire tally, verified naming him; the Working Families ceasefire tracker lists him too.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • No tracked funding badge appears because no committee support is recorded for him this cycle. An advocacy site’s framing (former-AIPAC-Democrats signing) is its own; the tracker’s list is the fact used.
  • The Casten-Sherman anti-displacement letter includes him per the lead office’s release; dates checked.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Nonprofit-security-grant coverage in the research record names program facts; dates checked.

Race and status context

  • Sitting member, nominated. His Republican challenger’s card carries its own record.

Also in this race

  1. ? Ron Eller (Republican)
  2. – Bennie Foster (Independent)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.