But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Michael Guest

Republican · U.S. House, Mississippi District 3
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Guest voted for every Israel aid bill and against both amendments to cut that aid. His record runs back to a 2021 interceptor-replenishment bill and a 2018 pledge of military assistance; his fullest statements sit in the war’s first weeks, on the research page.

✉  Copy a message to send them

The only address on file for this campaign is its compliance or filing contact, which will not answer a policy question. Copy this message and send it through their website or a public social account.

If you send this from your own email, cc replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org so we can post their answer.

✆  Call DC officeWebsite ↗X ↗Facebook ↗

Deep Dive

Guest represents Mississippi’s 3rd District, is the sitting member, and chairs the Ethics Committee.

His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card, all on the support side, including votes against both amendments to cut aid to Israel. His support predates the war: in 2021 he introduced legislation to replenish Iron Dome interceptors, saying "This is not a Republican or Democratic issue. This is about protecting innocent lives from the continued attacks by the terrorist group Hamas" (defensive-systems detail that stays on the research page), and his 2018 campaign paper pledged military assistance. A November 2023 radio appearance titled "America must stand with Israel" is on the research page.

Nothing located has him addressing U.S. aid to Palestinians at any date.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Committees

House Committee on Appropriations

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$23K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $22,900
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$22,900The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • His recorded votes appear as badges on this card, all support-side; the grounding for each sits in the record section.
  • [Prior, 2021-06-04] The interceptor-replenishment bill, verified with his protecting-innocent-lives quote. Prior band; defensive-systems detail stays off the front.
  • [Prior, 2018-04-02] The campaign foreign-policy pledge, per state-press coverage; prior band, our research.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-11-14] The SuperTalk appearance, dated on its page. Not on the card summary.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located at any date.

Characterization of the conflict

  • The in-window radio framing above; nothing further located in the position band.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Tracked funding totals appear as a badge on this card. Colleague letters (a Biden-condemnation editorial with 37 colleagues; delegation trips with the state’s senators) are dates checked. One Texas member’s Facebook post was offered as a source and is a misattributed-source shape; nothing claimed.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • His in-the-news items on the awareness act and campus protests are dates checked; nothing quoted.

Race and status context

  • Sitting member and committee chairman, nominated. His Democratic challenger’s card carries its own record.

Also in this race

  1. – Michael Chiaradio (Democrat)
  2. – Erik Kiehle (Libertarian)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.