But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Denise Powell

Democrat · U.S. House, Nebraska District 2
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: In an April 2026 voter-guide response she says she is "dedicated to protecting the U.S.-Israel relationship" and wants to "ensure that humanitarian aid can flow into Gaza and that the ceasefire holds", which points both ways. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

In the 2026 Jewish Federation of Omaha voter guide, Powell wrote she is “dedicated to protecting the U.S.-Israel relationship”, that “the first steps must be to ensure that humanitarian aid can flow into Gaza and that the ceasefire holds”, and backed a two-state solution. She disavowed Israel-focused outside groups.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Powell is the Democratic nominee in Nebraska’s 2nd District, an open swing seat.

Her written answers in the Jewish Federation of Omaha JCRC 2026 voter guide, verified against the published questionnaire, carry her positions. On Israel’s right to exist: "I strongly support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state. As the homeland and a refuge for the Jewish people, Israel’s existence should not be questioned." She calls Israel "a key ally to the United States" and "a key partner for spreading democracy and protecting U.S. security interests". On the war: "The first steps must be to ensure that humanitarian aid can flow into Gaza and that the ceasefire holds", followed by U.S. pressure toward "a two-state solution that allows peace and stability for both the Israeli and Palestinian people".

On lobbying, the sequence matters. At a January 2026 candidate forum she pledged to refuse funding from any special-interest groups, a general pledge that named no organization, per Jewish Insider. When pro-Israel PACs later entered the race anyway, The American Prospect reported that Democratic Majority for Israel canceled its Second District spending after realizing she "had disavowed support from all Israel-focused outside groups", and that other PACs kept spending without her consent. No tracked committee support appears on this card.

In the guide she defines antisemitism as "prejudice or hatred toward Jewish people", distinguishing it from legitimate policy criticism. Her criticism of the 2026 U.S. war in Iran sits on the research page.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

In their words

“I am dedicated to protecting the U.S.-Israel relationship, the security of our country, and promoting democracy and freedom in the region.”
Source ↗, 2026-04-30
“I strongly support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state. As the homeland and a refuge for the Jewish people, Israel’s existence should not be questioned.”
Source ↗, 2026-04-30

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2026-04] The JCRC 2026 voter guide (landing page), verified in the published PDF: the protecting-the-relationship answer quoted on the card. She states no position on arms conditions in the guide; nothing located elsewhere.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Position, 2026-04] The guide, verified: humanitarian aid flowing into Gaza and the ceasefire holding as first steps, quoted on the card.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2026-04] The guide, verified: right-to-exist and two-state answers, quoted in the deep dive.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Pledge, 2026-01-23] The Nebraska Young Democrats forum, verified: Jewish Insider reports she said she would not accept funding from any special-interest groups. A general pledge naming no organization; carried as such.
  • [Reported, 2026-05-06] The American Prospect, verified: DMFI canceled its spending after her disavowal of Israel-focused outside groups; successor PACs spent independently of her campaign.
  • [Iran, 2026-03] Nebraska Public Media’s Iran-war survey, verified: "our sons and daughters should not die in another Middle East war." Iran material, research page only.

Safety and antisemitism

  • [Position, 2026-04] The guide, verified: her definition and her line that political speech "is not about the race, gender, faith, ethnicity, or identity of a person or group of people".

Race and status context

  • Democratic nominee against Republican Brinker Harding, whose card carries its own record.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Brinker Harding (Republican)
  2. – Eric Michael Foreman (Libertarian)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.