Chris Pappas

Democrat · U.S. Senate, New Hampshire

Pappas voted present on an amendment to strip U.S. military financing for the government of Israel, saying he could not back it "as written" but could not back "the disproportionate, extreme policies of the Netanyahu government" either. He has voted for the aid packages.

Pappas is a sitting member of the House from New Hampshire's 1st District and a Democratic candidate for the Senate. His recorded votes are on this card, and unlike most of the records in this batch they do not all point the same way. He has now explained why, in his own words.

In July 2026 the House voted on an amendment to bar the year's appropriations from being used for Israel and to remove $3.3 billion from Foreign Military Financing. It was taken on July 15, 2026, by which date the Gaza health ministry had reported 73,246 people killed in Gaza, 20,179 of them children. He was recorded present, and his statement the same day gives both halves of the reason. Against the amendment: it is "overly broad", and "Enacting it would hamstring our humanitarian efforts in the region by limiting funding for programs that support Palestinian economic development and peacebuilding efforts between Israelis and Palestinians." Against the status quo: "I have deep concerns about the path Prime Minister Netanyahu continues to pursue that undermines the long term security objectives of Israel and the United States. This path won't lead to peace, only to more war and instability." And the conclusion: "I voted present today because I cannot support this amendment as written but also cannot support the disproportionate, extreme policies of the Netanyahu government."

Two years earlier he was on the other side of a similar argument, and the aid he had voted for is worth separating out: the April 2024 package he backed was $26.38 billion, $4 billion of it for the Iron Dome and David's Sling interceptor systems and $1.2 billion for Iron Beam, at a reported death toll then of 34,049 with 14,685 children among them. When the administration held back shipments of 2,000-pound and 500-pound bombs, he said he remained "concerned by President Biden's intention to delay certain weapons shipments to Israel and the message that sends", and that "America must never neglect our obligation to support our allies in their times of need", while voting against the Republican bill written to force the deliveries, which he called a cynically partisan move that did nothing to help.

His campaign sets out the same two-sided position. It says he has supported bipartisan security assistance for the government of Israel and voted for more than $9 billion in humanitarian aid to Gaza, calls for a ceasefire that returns the hostages and lets aid flow freely, and backs a two-state solution. In July 2025 he called for new corridors, safe zones and airdrops to get food into Gaza.

So the shape of his record is: keep the security assistance, keep and expand the humanitarian aid, refuse to force deliveries the executive has paused, and refuse to cut the financing outright.

Tracked votes: backed sending U.S. weapons or funding to the government of Israel in 3 of 5 recorded votes.

Research

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

U.S. aid to Palestinians

Characterization of the conflict

Related rhetoric and lobbying

Safety and antisemitism (context)

Race and status context

See the full record →

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open the interactive card for votes, funding and contact details.