But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Chris Smith

Republican · U.S. House, New Jersey District 4
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Smith said in June 2025: "I have and will always strongly support Israel." He co-chairs the Congressional Israel Allies Caucus, and in 2024 argued for delivering both defensive systems and offensive capabilities without delay.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Smith has represented New Jersey's 4th District since 1981 and co-chairs both the Congressional Israel Allies Caucus and the House Bipartisan Task Force for Combating Antisemitism.

His June 2025 statement on Israel's operations against Iran states the commitment without qualification: "Israel did not initiate this conflict, it has responded to the Iran's existential threats and unrelenting war and aggression. I have and will always strongly support Israel, defend Americans in harm's way, and prevent Iran from acquiring the capacity to produce nuclear weapons." He added that "Iran cannot be permitted to obtain a nuclear weapon" and that a nuclear-armed Iran "would be a mortal danger not only to Israel and America but every country in the Middle East."

On the aid itself, the research records that in April 2024 he spoke on the House floor for the $26 billion package, arguing the United States must deliver defensive systems such as Iron Dome and David's Sling along with necessary offensive capabilities without delay. In May 2024 he opposed the pause on heavy munitions shipments before the Rafah operation, and in July 2026 he restated his opposition to cutting or conditioning U.S. security assistance.

He authored the legislation creating the State Department's Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism.

His recorded votes appear as badges on this card and are consistent with all of it.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Committees

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Co-sponsorbacks this bill to send more support
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$28K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $27,900
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$27,900The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“I have and will always strongly support Israel, defend Americans in harm's way, and prevent Iran from acquiring the capacity to produce nuclear weapons.”
Source ↗, 2025-06-13
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2025-06-13] His statement on the conflict with Iran, cited twice by the research and opened and confirmed word for word: "Iran cannot be permitted to obtain a nuclear weapon. If Iran succeeds in procuring weapons of mass destruction, there is a high probability that they will use them. Israel did not initiate this conflict, it has responded to the Iran's existential threats and unrelenting war and aggression. I have and will always strongly support Israel, defend Americans in harm's way, and prevent Iran from acquiring the capacity to produce nuclear weapons. A nuclear-armed Iran would be a mortal danger not only to Israel and America but every country in the Middle East." (The original sets "conflict" and "it has responded" apart with an em dash, and carries the grammatical slip "the Iran's"; both are left as printed.)
  • [Position, 2024-04-20, reported] Spoke on the House floor for the emergency assistance providing over $26 billion in military aid, arguing the United States must deliver defensive systems such as Iron Dome and David's Sling along with necessary offensive capabilities without delay. Cource not located as a readable page; summarised, not quoted.
  • [Position, 2024-05, reported] Opposed the pause on heavy munitions shipments before the Rafah operation. See also Patch coverage and NJ Spotlight News on shifting New Jersey Democratic votes. Not opened.
  • [Position, 2026-07-16] The research cites a page on his own site for his restated opposition to cutting or conditioning U.S. security assistance. **Opened: the page is a video item titled "Rep. Chris Smith Sounds Alarm on Rising Antisemitism & House Vote to Cut Aid to Israel" and carries no transcript**, so the position is recorded as reported and nothing is quoted from it. Also a July 2026 release, not opened.
  • His recorded votes appear as badges on this card.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • No statement located in support of U.S. humanitarian aid to Palestinians. The research records his opening remarks at a hearing on UNRWA (PDF, not opened), which concerns the agency rather than aid levels.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Position, 2024-01-26, reported] Called the genocide allegations at the International Court of Justice grossly unfounded, false and dangerous, maintaining Israel was acting in self-defence. Dated 2024-01-26, the first day of the position band. Cource not located; recorded as reported.
  • [Position, 2025-06-13] "Israel did not initiate this conflict" (confirmed verbatim, above).
  • [After October 7, 2023-10-25, reported] Characterised the October 7 attacks as "barbaric" and "genocidal" and said "Israel's right to defend itself from Hamas invasion is absolute." From the weeks right after October 7.
  • [After October 7, 2023-11-16] Told NJ Spotlight News he was not ready to support a ceasefire (the video item, cited twice). From the weeks right after October 7; video source.
  • [After October 7, 2023-11-13] JNS on his account of the UN record on Israel. From the weeks right after October 7.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Co-Chair of the bipartisan Congressional Israel Allies Caucus, as reported.
  • [Position, 2026-03-19] JNS reports that an account impersonating him was posting antisemitic content and that he could not get it removed. About impersonation of him; not a position.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • Co-Chair of the House Bipartisan Task Force for Combating Antisemitism, and, as reported the author of the legislation establishing the State Department Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism. Also a June 2023 hearing and a November 2023 item. Safety context, never an answer about U.S. weapons or funding.

⚠ Note on the sources

  • Twenty-one entries. **Seven are unlabelled YouTube videos** (two duplicated), one resolves to nothing, one is a paginated document-query index which is a listing page, and the July 2026 item cited for his aid position turned out to be a video page with no transcript. His single fullest statement was opened and verified.

Also in this race

  1. – Rachel Peace (Democrat)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.