But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Rachel Peace
Democrat · U.S. House, New Jersey District 4
–No Position Found
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
Peace has not spoken publicly on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. No statement was found in source-checked research across 8 sources.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
8 sources checked and resolved, every one listed on the research page. Most candidates at this level have simply never been asked.
You are better placed to change that than we are. Ask Peace directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in their own words, which is worth more than anything we could write about them.
The money
Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found
2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
What was looked for, and what came back
**U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There are no recorded public statements, policy papers, or actions by Rachel Peace regarding U.S. military aid or weapons transfers to Israel. Other material came back under this heading; it is set out in full below.
**Characterization of the conflict:** There are no public statements or positions from Rachel Peace characterizing the Israel/Palestine conflict. Other material came back under this heading; it is set out in full below.
**Rhetoric and lobbying:** There are no public statements or recorded positions by Rachel Peace concerning Israel-related political rhetoric, lobbying organizations, or advocacy groups. Other material came back under this heading; it is set out in full below.
**Safety and antisemitism:** There are no public statements or recorded positions from Rachel Peace addressing antisemitism or safety regarding Jewish or Middle Eastern communities. Other material came back under this heading; it is set out in full below.
What else came back
The card's claim is about what the United States sends, and no position was found there. These sections returned material beyond a bare verdict. It is reproduced word for word so nothing found is lost; none of it is a position on U.S. weapons or money. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.
### U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel There are no recorded public statements, policy papers, or actions by Rachel Peace regarding U.S. military aid or weapons transfers to Israel. An independent review of New Jersey congressional campaign platforms published on May 26, 2026, noted that foreign policy concerns regarding Israel were absent from her official campaign site.
---
### Characterization of the conflict There are no public statements or positions from Rachel Peace characterizing the Israel/Palestine conflict. Throughout her primary campaign leading up to her June 2, 2026 victory, her public platform focused almost exclusively on domestic affordability issues, including healthcare expansion, paid family leave, Medicaid protection, housing, and Jersey Shore environmental conservation.
---
### Rhetoric and lobbying There are no public statements or recorded positions by Rachel Peace concerning Israel-related political rhetoric, lobbying organizations, or advocacy groups. During a campaign "Ask Me Anything" session on Reddit on May 7, 2026, she discussed foreign policy in the context of congressional war powers and executive restraint, but she made no mention of Israel-related lobbying or rhetoric.
---
### Safety and antisemitism There are no public statements or recorded positions from Rachel Peace addressing antisemitism or safety regarding Jewish or Middle Eastern communities. Her platform leading toward the November 3, 2026 general election centers on domestic social safety nets, economic equity, and public health.
But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and
funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps.
Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.