But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Patrick Halpin

Democrat · U.S. House, New York District 2
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: In an October 2025 Facebook post he writes of "too much death, destruction and hardship in Israel and Gaza" and calls for the peace plan to be implemented, without saying where he stands on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Halpin has not spoken publicly on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. No statement was found in source-checked research across 5 sources.

✉  Email the campaignWebsite ↗X ↗Facebook ↗

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

5 sources checked and read, every one listed on the research page. Most candidates at this level have simply never been asked.

You are better placed to change that than we are. Ask Halpin directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in their own words, which is worth more than anything we could write about them.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

What was looked for, and what came back

  • **U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There are no recorded public statements, published policy platforms, or official campaign positions by Patrick Halpin regarding U.S. military aid, arms transfers, or weapons shipments to Israel.
  • **Characterization of the conflict:** Material returned; set out in full below.
  • **Rhetoric and lobbying:** There are no recorded public statements, position papers, or campaign stances by Patrick Halpin regarding Israel-related lobbying organizations (such as AIPAC), political rhetoric, or pro-Israel advocacy groups.
  • **Safety and antisemitism:** During his term as Suffolk County Executive (**1988–1991**), Halpin established the Suffolk County Anti-Bias Task Force to combat hate crimes and bias-motivated discrimination, appointing Rabbi Dr. Steven A.

What an initial search did return, on the other questions

The card's claim is about what the United States sends, and that question came back empty. These questions did return material. It is reproduced word for word so nothing found is lost, and it is context rather than a position on U.S. weapons or money. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.

### Characterization of the conflict On **October 13, 2025**, Halpin posted a statement on social media addressing the violence in Israel and Gaza. He characterized the conflict as bringing "too much death, destruction and hardship in Israel and Gaza". In the post, Halpin expressed sympathy for released hostages and their families, as well as for victims of the conflict, while calling for diplomatic implementation of peace agreements: > *"Today is the dawn of a new opportunity to bring lasting peace, prosperity, and a bright future to the region. My heart is with the hostages who have been released and their families, and with the families of those who didn't live to see today. I commend the president and all of the other nations that have come together to make this day possible. Now the hard work begins to ensure that the plan for peace is fully implemented."*

---

Sources consulted and read (5)

Not found

  • No position located on U.S. weapons, arms sales or military funding for the government of Israel.
  • No position located on U.S. aid to Palestinians, UNRWA or Gaza humanitarian funding.
  • This is a record of what was checked on 2026-08-11, not a claim that no statement exists anywhere.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Andrew R. Garbarino (Republican)

All New York candidates.

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.