But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Vivek Ramaswamy

Republican · Governor, Ohio
✓From their own words

Campaigning for governor in April 2026, Ramaswamy told Ohio State students that the fixation on Israel was "beyond bizarre" since the U.S. sends aid to hundreds of other countries. He said the $3.8 billion a year in U.S. military aid to the government of Israel "should be sunset".

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Ramaswamy, the biotech entrepreneur and 2024 presidential candidate, won Ohio's May 2026 Republican primary for governor. His aid position was built in that presidential run and he has restated it since, so it is current.

The plan, from August 2023: let the ten-year U.S.-Israel military aid memorandum expire in 2028 rather than renew it, so that, as he told the Washington Free Beacon, Israel is "so strongly standing on its own two feet, integrated into the economic and security infrastructure of" the region through expanded Abraham Accords. On Russell Brand's show on Rumble he said "Come 2028, that additional aid won’t be necessary"; at the first Republican presidential debate he framed the relationship as a friendship rather than a "client relationship". Later that month, after criticism, he told Israel Hayom "we’re not going to cut the aid until Israel tells us that" and said more aid would be "very reasonable" if the government of Israel asked for it.

In April 2026, at a Turning Point USA event at Ohio State University, he defended the record as a governor candidate. Answering a student's question, he said: "I think it was in the best interests of the United States — and for what it’s worth, in the best interests of Israel, but I’m looking after the interests of the United States — to say that $3.8 billion a year should be sunset". At the same event he cautioned that "antisemitic instincts of laser focusing on this without focusing on other problems" are "weird, bizarre, and should probably also stop".

He has also spoken about antisemitism during this campaign. In a December 2025 New York Times op-ed, quoted by Jewish Insider, he wrote that he would be his Jewish opponent's "most vocal defender against antisemitic attacks from left or right." On August 31, 2026 he told the Republican Jewish Coalition in Las Vegas that the antisemitism "now spreading across our country is not just an attack on Jewish people; it is an attack on success". The coalition describes its mission as fostering "ties between the American Jewish community and Republican decision-makers."

A governor has no vote on federal aid; he has restated the position during this campaign.

The record

Notable actions

• August 2023: As a presidential candidate, proposed 'Abraham Accords 2.0' under which the current US-Israel military aid memorandum ($3.8B/year, $38B over 10 years) would sunset after its 2028 expiration, with Israel 'standing on its own two feet'; clarified by email that aid would continue if the plan failed.

• August 21, 2023: Drew formal criticism from pro-Israel Republicans over the aid-sunset proposal: RJC CEO Matt Brooks released a public letter to him, and Nikki Haley issued a statement calling the proposal wrong; conservative hosts Mark Levin and Ari Hoffman also objected.

• August 23, 2023: Defended the aid-sunset position on stage at the first GOP presidential debate in Milwaukee after Haley said 'He wants to go and stop funding Israel,' calling the US-Israel relationship 'a friendship,' not 'a client relationship.'

• Late October 2023 (after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack): Told the Republican Jewish Coalition summit that 'if left unrestrained, the IDF will be able to get the job done of defending Israel,' then a day later called decades of US aid to the government of Israel 'a fake security blanket that breeds complacency' at an Iowa town hall. NBC News set the two remarks side by side in a report headlined 'Vivek Ramaswamy tailors his message on Israel to fit the audience'; the Free Beacon separately catalogued earlier position shifts, including a June 2023 statement that he favored aid and an on-air denial that he had proposed ending it.

• November 8, 2023: At the third GOP presidential debate (Miami), said he would tell Netanyahu to 'smoke those terrorists,' backing Israel's war against Hamas while remaining the field's aid skeptic.

• April 21, 2026: As Ohio gubernatorial candidate, reaffirmed at a Turning Point USA event at Ohio State University that the $3.8 billion in annual US aid to Israel 'should be sunset,' while calling both the political fixation on Israel and 'antisemitic instincts of laser focusing' on it bizarre; his Ohio platform itself contains no Israel-related planks.

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. In their own words on April 21, 2026.

In their words

“Come 2028, that additional aid won’t be necessary in order to still have the kind of stability that we’d actually have in the Middle East by having Israel more integrated in with its partners”
“There’s no North Star commitment to any one country, other than the United States of America”
“If we’re successful, the true mark of success for the U.S., and for Israel, will be to get to a 2028 where Israel is so strongly standing on its own two feet, integrated into the economic and security infrastructure of the rest of the Middle East, that it will not require and be dependent on that same level of historical aid or commitment from the U.S.”
Source ↗, 2023-08-19
“The big difference is to see if the Abraham Accords 2.0 is indeed successful at getting Israel to a stronger place than it is today while relying on U.S. aid. If it is, then that is the best-case scenario for all; if it’s not, then the aid will continue.”
“But it’s not a client relationship, it is a friendship. And you know what friends do? Friends help each other stand on their own two feet.”
Source ↗, 2023-08-23
“I think it was in the best interests of the United States — and for what it’s worth, in the best interests of Israel, but I’m looking after the interests of the United States — to say that $3.8 billion a year should be sunset”
Source ↗, 2026-04-21
“I would say some antisemitic instincts of laser focusing on this without focusing on other problems is also weird, bizarre, and should probably also stop”
Source ↗, 2026-04-21
“Why am I here at the Republican Jewish Coalition talking to you about success? It is because you represent the most successful demographic group in America, and the antisemitism that is now spreading across our country is not just an attack on Jewish people; it is an attack on success”
Source ↗, 2026-08-31
“We must practice what we preach: My current Democrat opponent in Ohio is a Jewish woman, and while I criticize her policy record unsparingly, I will be her most vocal defender against antisemitic attacks from left or right.”
Source ↗, 2025-12-17

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • [Position, 2026-04-21] Answering a student at a Turning Point USA event at Ohio State University, as the Deseret News reported: "I think it was in the best interests of the United States — and for what it’s worth, in the best interests of Israel, but I’m looking after the interests of the United States — to say that $3.8 billion a year should be sunset" (Deseret).
  • [Prior, 2023-08-19] The sunset plan, in an interview with the Washington Free Beacon (Free Beacon): end military aid at the 2028 MOU expiration: "If we’re successful, the true mark of success for the U.S., and for Israel, will be to get to a 2028 where Israel is so strongly standing on its own two feet..."; and, in an email to the Free Beacon, "The big difference is to see if the Abraham Accords 2.0 is indeed successful...".
  • [Prior, 2023-08-18] Russell Brand interview on Rumble, reported by JTA in the Times of Israel: "Come 2028, that additional aid won’t be necessary..."; "There’s no North Star commitment to any one country, other than the United States of America" (Times of Israel).
  • [Prior, 2023-08-23] First primary debate: "Our relationship with Israel will never be stronger than by the end of my first term," he said. "But it’s not a client relationship, it is a friendship." (JTA). The phrase "transactional client relationship", which some summaries attach to him, is not in the JTA report and is not confirmed. An American Jewish Congress press-mention page about his September 2023 interview with the Forward no longer opens, so it is not linked.
  • [Prior, 2023-08-30] Walk-back after criticism, in an interview with Israel Hayom: "But we’re not going to cut the aid until Israel tells us that." If Israel asked for more aid, that would be "very reasonable … as long as it’s running through the US." He said the aid "runs through the US industrial base" (Algemeiner; JPost, which reports that he "won't cut the aid until Israel says it doesn't need it anymore" in its own words).
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-24] "No money" approach for the Hamas conflict; a "diplomatic Iron Dome" of political cover instead of financial entanglement (the Axios pages could not be opened; forum on the arms trade profile). Not on the card summary.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-28/29] To the Republican Jewish Coalition summit: "I have full confidence that if left unrestrained, the IDF will be able to get the job done of defending Israel." At a West Des Moines town hall the next day: "We’ve been giving Israel aid for decades, and yet still none of that failed to prevent this attack. … It’s a flawed sense of security, a fake security blanket that breeds complacency" (the ellipsis is NBC News's; NBC News). Not on the card summary.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located in any band.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Prior, 2023-07-31] Backed Trump-era policies: Jerusalem embassy, Golan recognition, normalization agreements (as reported).
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-07/10] Condemned Hamas as "medieval," "subhuman"; Israel's right to defend its existence. Not on the card summary.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-24] Hudson Institute speech cautioning against a full ground invasion (multi-front war risk; the Washington Times page could not be opened). Not on the card summary.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-29] Urged decisively destroying Hamas and Hezbollah leadership; set aside two-state talk for normalization diplomacy. Not on the card summary.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-11-08] Third primary debate, asked what he would advise Israel's prime minister: "I would tell him to smoke those terrorists on his southern border," he said. "And then I’ll tell him as president of the United States, I’ll be smoking the terrorists on our southern border." (Cleveland Jewish News; AP profile). Not on the card summary.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Position, 2026-04-21] The antisemitic-instincts caution, at the same Turning Point USA event: "I would say some antisemitic instincts of laser focusing on this without focusing on other problems is also weird, bizarre, and should probably also stop" (Deseret above). The Deseret News reports that he called the fixation on Israel "beyond bizarre" given that the U.S. sends foreign aid to hundreds of other countries.
  • [Position, 2026-07-28; reported 2026-08-06] NBC4 Columbus reported that at the Young Americans for Liberty convention in Cincinnati the crowd "heckled him on data centers and Israel." The report quotes nothing he said about Israel (NBC4).
  • [Reaction window, 2023-11-08/09] Campus-speech remarks: opposed cancel culture aimed at pro-Palestinian students while condemning the underlying views (Reason). Not on the card summary.
  • [Position, 2025-04-26] Free-speech remarks on campus indoctrination (India Today); adjacent context.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

  • [Position, 2026-08-31] Speech to the Republican Jewish Coalition's annual conference in Las Vegas: "Why am I here at the Republican Jewish Coalition talking to you about success? It is because you represent the most successful demographic group in America, and the antisemitism that is now spreading across our country is not just an attack on Jewish people; it is an attack on success". Jewish Insider reports that he described antisemitism as an expression of "envy of Jewish achievement" (Jewish Insider). The coalition describes its mission: "We seek to foster and enhance ties between the American Jewish community and Republican decision-makers." (RJC).
  • [Position, 2025-12-17] In a New York Times op-ed against the "Groyper" movement, as quoted by Jewish Insider: "Conservative leaders should condemn — without hedging — Groyper transgressions". And: "We must practice what we preach: My current Democrat opponent in Ohio is a Jewish woman, and while I criticize her policy record unsparingly, I will be her most vocal defender against antisemitic attacks from left or right." (Jewish Insider, 2026-01-16; the op-ed's date is from KOMO News, which reported on 2025-12-18 that it was published on Wednesday). The op-ed itself, at https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/17/opinion/republican-identity-divide.html, could not be opened.
  • [Position, 2026-04-21] The Deseret caution above.

Places that could not be read, so nothing is claimed from them

  • The New York Times op-ed of 2025-12-17 (above): could not be opened; its words are taken from Jewish Insider's quotation.
  • The American Jewish Congress press-mention page on his 2023 Forward interview: 404 on every attempt.

Also in this race

  1. – Amy Acton (Democrat)
  2. – Don Kissick (Libertarian)
  3. – Tim Grady (write-in) (Other)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.