But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
William Timmons
- Backed with $28K by PACs we track that support U.S. weapons funding for the government of Israel (lifetime)
- Endorsed by AIPAC
Timmons voted for every tracked aid bill and against both amendments cutting it, writing in April 2024 that Biden “catered to the anti-Semitic, woke liberals who believe Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East, does not have the right to exist”. He toured GWU’s encampment with Oversight Republicans.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
You asked William Timmons where they stand.
Deep Dive
Timmons has represented South Carolina’s 4th District since 2019. His six recorded votes appear as badges on this card: Yes on all four tracked aid measures, No on both amendments to cut aid to Israel.
His April 2024 statement on the security-assistance package, verified on his site, carries his frame: aiding Israel was essential to "support our allies, oppose the dangerous terrorist group Hamas", and the front quote’s attack on the administration sits in the same release. In May 2024 he joined House Oversight Republicans touring the George Washington University encampment, verified with him named in the committee release, which called on D.C. officials to clear what it described as an unlawful, antisemitic encampment.
His February 2026 social-media praise for joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran is Iran material on an unretrieved news source and stays on the research page as reported, not confirmed directly. A December 2024 commemoration of Omer Neutra, the American-Israeli hostage, sits on his own Facebook account, not yet confirmed. AIPAC’s and the Republican Jewish Coalition’s tracked support appears as badges on this card.
Nothing located has him addressing U.S. aid to Palestinians as a distinct question.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)
The money
$28K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
In their words
AIPAC (2026 endorsement)
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- His recorded votes appear as badges on this card: Yes on H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, H.R. 8369, and H.R. 7217; No on both amendments to cut aid to Israel.
- [Position, 2024-04-20] The security-assistance statement, verified and quoted on the card.
- [Reported, 2024-04-16] A House floor speech urging prompt passage of the package; marked uncorroborated in the research, reported, not confirmed directly.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- Nothing located at any date.
Characterization of the conflict
- [Position, 2024-04-20] The same release’s Hamas and greatest-ally characterizations, verified.
- [Iran, 2026-02-28] His reported X post praising joint strikes on Iran ("protecting our people and standing unshaken"); the offered news source could not be retrieved, and Iran material stays here regardless; reported, not confirmed directly.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
- [Action, 2024-05-01] The Oversight Republicans’ encampment tour and statement, verified with him named.
- Tracked AIPAC and RJC support appears as badges on this card.
Safety and antisemitism
- [Not yet confirmed, 2024-12-02] The Omer Neutra commemoration on his own Facebook account.
- The encampment statement above frames the camp as antisemitic; the committee’s characterization, carried as such.
Race and status context
- Sitting member, nominated. His Democratic challenger’s card carries its own record.
Also in this race
- –No Position Found Courtney McClain (Democrat)
- –Research Underway Jessica Ethridge (Libertarian)
All South Carolina candidates.
See everyone on the South Carolina ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.