But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Clay Faircloth

Independent · U.S. House, Tennessee District 4
–
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

Faircloth has not spoken publicly on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. No statement was found in source-checked research across 5 sources.

✉  Copy a message to send them

We don’t have a campaign email on file yet. Copy this message and send it through their website or a public social account.

If you send this from your own email, cc replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org so we can post their answer.

X ↗Facebook ↗

Deep Dive

5 sources checked and resolved, every one listed on the research page. Most candidates at this level have simply never been asked.

You are better placed to change that than we are. Ask Faircloth directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in their own words, which is worth more than anything we could write about them.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-09-27) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

What was looked for, and what came back

  • **U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There is no public record of Clay Faircloth making statements or taking positions on U.S. military aid, arms sales, or defense transfers to Israel.
  • **Characterization of the conflict:** In a podcast episode published on **June 15, 2026**, Clay Faircloth made a brief statement calling for human empathy across political and geopolitical divides, specifically highlighting Israelis and Palestinians. Other material came back under this heading; it is set out in full below.
  • **Rhetoric and lobbying:** There is no public record of Clay Faircloth making statements or taking actions regarding Israel-related political lobbying, political action committees, or rhetoric surrounding Middle East advocacy groups.
  • **Safety and antisemitism:** There is no public record of Clay Faircloth making specific public statements or taking actions regarding antisemitism or the safety of Jewish communities.

What else came back

The card's claim is about what the United States sends, and no position was found there. These sections returned material beyond a bare verdict. It is reproduced word for word so nothing found is lost; none of it is a position on U.S. weapons or money. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.

### Characterization of the conflict In a podcast episode published on **June 15, 2026**, Clay Faircloth made a brief statement calling for human empathy across political and geopolitical divides, specifically highlighting Israelis and Palestinians. He stated:

> *"Pick your geopolitical adversaries. Pick your political adversaries in our domestic politics. The thing that we all have in common on the right, left, whoever we are - Palestinians and Jews... We all love our children and the moral challenge is for us to be able to look into the eyes of other people's children and see a glimpse of our own children."*

Beyond this call for mutual empathy and recognition of shared humanity between Palestinians and Jews, Faircloth has not published detailed political analyses or policy platforms characterizing the broader conflict.

---

Sources consulted and resolved (5)

Not found

  • No position located on U.S. weapons, arms sales or military funding for the government of Israel.
  • No position located on U.S. aid to Palestinians, UNRWA or Gaza humanitarian funding.
  • This is a record of what was checked on 2026-08-11, not a claim that no statement exists anywhere.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Scott DesJarlais (Republican)
  2. ? Victoria Broderick (Democrat)
  3. ✓ Jacob Kristopher Anders (Independent)

All Tennessee candidates.

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.