But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Trever Nehls

Republican · U.S. House, Texas District 22
–
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

Nehls has not spoken publicly on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. No statement was found in source-checked research across 4 sources.

✉  Email the campaignWebsite ↗X ↗Facebook ↗

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

4 sources checked and read, every one listed on the research page. Most candidates at this level have simply never been asked.

You are better placed to change that than we are. Ask Nehls directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in their own words, which is worth more than anything we could write about them.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

What was looked for, and what came back

  • **U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There are no documented public statements, policy positions, or official records from Trever Nehls specifically addressing U.S. military aid or weapons transfers to Israel.
  • **Characterization of the conflict:** There are no public statements or campaign materials in which Trever Nehls provides a detailed characterization of the Israel/Palestine conflict.
  • **Rhetoric and lobbying:** Material returned; set out in full below.
  • **Safety and antisemitism:** There are no recorded public statements, policy plans, or official campaign stances by Trever Nehls regarding safety issues specific to Jewish communities or the prevention of antisemitism.

What an initial search did return, on the other questions

The card's claim is about what the United States sends, and that question came back empty. These questions did return material. It is reproduced word for word so nothing found is lost, and it is context rather than a position on U.S. weapons or money. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.

### Rhetoric and lobbying * **August 5, 2026:** Community figure Srikanth Nakirekanti published details of a meeting with Trever Nehls and Acting Fort Bend County Judge Daniel Wong. Nakirekanti noted that they engaged in a "meaningful discussion about the strong relationship between the United States and Israel and the importance of continuing to strengthen that partnership," expressing appreciation for Nehls's support for Israel.

Beyond this outreach meeting, there are no documented instances of Israel-related lobbying or specific political rhetoric from his candidate profile.

Sources consulted and read (4)

Not found

  • No position located on U.S. weapons, arms sales or military funding for the government of Israel.
  • No position located on U.S. aid to Palestinians, UNRWA or Gaza humanitarian funding.
  • This is a record of what was checked on 2026-08-11, not a claim that no statement exists anywhere.

Also in this race

  1. ? Marquette Greene-Scott (Democrat)

All Texas candidates.

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.