But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Keith Self

Republican · U.S. House, Texas District 3
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Self led a letter urging the president to "unlock all Congressionally approved foreign aid to Israel" without delay, and demanded the administration stop conditioning that aid on Gaza humanitarian benchmarks.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Self represents Texas’s 3rd District and took office in January 2023. His position is that appropriated aid should flow without conditions, and he has pursued it against administrations of both parties.

In October 2024, after Iranian missile strikes on Israel, he led a letter signed by five House Republican colleagues urging President Biden to unlock all Congressionally approved foreign aid to Israel without delay and to enforce existing sanctions on Iran.

Later that month he publicly admonished the Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense after they warned Israeli officials that military aid could be affected if Gaza humanitarian access benchmarks were not met. He demanded the administration cease "dictating the rules of engagement" and release all aid so Israel could finish its war on terror. That is a position on conditionality specifically, which is what makes it precise rather than general support.

In April 2024 he opposed a procedural rule bundling multiple foreign aid packages together, while noting House Republicans had already passed a standalone $14.5 billion military aid package for Israel and calling Israel "our closest Middle East ally". His objection was to the bundling, not the aid.

He has also introduced a bill he describes as exposing fraudulent Palestinian claims and condemned a UN General Assembly action. Recorded votes on the tracked bills are shown separately on this card.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Committees

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$20K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $20,000
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$20,000The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • 2024-04-19 [Current position]: Press release opposing a House procedural rule combining multiple foreign aid packages. While opposing the bundled bill he noted House Republicans had previously passed a standalone $14.5 billion military aid package for Israel, calling Israel "our closest Middle East ally". **His objection was to the packaging, not to the aid**, which matters if a tracked-vote badge on this card records a vote against a bundled measure.
  • 2024-10-02 [Current position]: After Iranian missile strikes on Israel he led a letter signed by five House Republican colleagues urging President Biden to "unlock all Congressionally approved foreign aid to Israel" without delay and enforce all existing sanctions against Iran.
  • 2024-10-18 [Current position]: Admonished the Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense after they warned Israeli officials that military aid could be affected if Gaza humanitarian access benchmarks were not met, demanding the administration cease "dictating the rules of engagement" and release all aid so Israel could "finish its war on terror". A position on CONDITIONALITY, which is more specific than general support.

Characterization of the conflict

Rhetoric and lobbying

  • Three sources found are videos (one, two, three) with no retrievable text.

Safety and antisemitism

  • Nothing located.

What came back empty or unusable

  • No statement located on U.S. aid to Palestinians or UNRWA as a budget line, though the bill on Palestinian claims may bear on it and its contents were not established.
  • Every source page is his own House release. Well documented, no independent reporting.

Also in this race

  1. ? Evan Hunt (Democrat)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.