But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Blake D. Moore

Republican · U.S. House, Utah District 2
✗Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Moore voted for every tracked aid bill and against both amendments cutting it, writing in April 2024: “there has never been a more important time to support our ally Israel as they face unprecedented threats from all sides”. His campaign platform says he is “proud to stand with Israel”.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Moore has represented Utah in the House since 2021, running in the redrawn 2nd District, and is House Republican Conference vice chair. His six recorded votes appear as badges on this card: Yes on all four tracked aid measures, No on both amendments to cut aid to Israel.

His April 2024 statement on the foreign-aid bills carries the front quote inside a peace-through-strength frame. His campaign platform, verified, states he is "proud to stand with Israel and has supported multiple initiatives to help Israel defend itself against Hamas’s terrorist attacks."

In August 2025 he told the Salt Lake Tribune he hoped the administration was pushing Israel to allow more aid into Gaza; the offered source is a Facebook post of the story, not yet confirmed. In December 2024, as conference vice chair, he co-released the House Republican leadership report on campus antisemitism with Rep. Stefanik, verified via the Jerusalem Post’s coverage; in May 2024 he joined a letter demanding a CBP investigation of foreign funding behind campus demonstrations (his release page could not be retrieved; reported, not confirmed directly). In a December 2020 JNS interview he opposed the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, "always been disheartened by any type of anti-Semitic movement or attitudes that exist."

His October and November 2023 statements are on the research page. AIPAC’s and the Republican Jewish Coalition’s tracked support appears as badges on this card.

The record

Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes

Floor votes
H.R. 6126 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act2023-11-02 · Passed 226-196
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8034 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-04-20 · Passed 366-58
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 8369 - Israel Security Assistance Support Act2024-05-16 · Passed 224-187
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.R. 7217 - Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 20242024-02-06 · Failed 250-180 (needed 2/3 under suspension)
✗ Voted Yes
supported sending it
H.Amdt. 55 to H.R. 4016 - strike $500M for Israeli Cooperative Programs2025-07-18 · Failed 6-422 (only 6 voted to cut)
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
H.R. 8595 - Massie amendment (Part A No. 8) to bar FY27 funds for Israel and cut $3.3B in Foreign Military Financing2026-07-15 · Failed 104-314
✗ Voted No
voted against limiting it
Bill sponsorship
H.R. 3565 - Block the Bombs ActWould bar transfer of 2,000-lb/BLU-109 bunker busters, JDAMs, 120mm tank rounds, and 155mm artillery shells to Israel. Does not affect Iron
Not sponsoringhas not backed this restriction bill
H.R. 1229 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025Formalizes/expands bilateral defense cooperation with Israel.
Not sponsoringhas not backed this support bill
Notable actions

• Vote record imported from official House Clerk roll calls for H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, and H.R. 8369. Other position fields remain under investigation.

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)

The money

$25K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track

Lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
AIPAC PAC: $20,000 · Republican Jewish Coalition: $5,000
Support-only OpenFEC data (as of 2026-10-03). Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
Who these lobbying groups are
AIPAC$20,000The American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.Republican Jewish Coalition$5,000The Republican Jewish Coalition's PAC; it financially supports Republican candidates who reflect its priorities, including strong U.S. backing of the government of Israel.Direct contributions and independent expenditures supporting this candidate from the five lobbying groups we track, every cycle each has filed, through 2026. Excludes earmarked and conduit contributions.
Endorsed by AIPAC
AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee; its PAC backs candidates it sees as strengthening U.S. ties with the government of Israel, including continued U.S. military aid.These endorsements come from groups that back sending U.S. weapons and funding to the government of Israel.

In their words

“Notably, there has never been a more important time to support our ally Israel as they face unprecedented threats from all sides.”
Source ↗, 2024-04-26
“He is also proud to stand with Israel and has supported multiple initiatives to help Israel defend itself against Hamas’s terrorist attacks.”
Source ↗, 2026-08-21
Endorsements

AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • His recorded votes appear as badges on this card: Yes on H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, H.R. 8369, and H.R. 7217; No on both amendments to cut aid to Israel.
  • [Position, 2024-04-26] The foreign-aid statement, verified and quoted on the card.
  • [Position, standing platform] The campaign platform page, verified and quoted on the card; a live page, recorded on the date we read it.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • [Not yet confirmed, 2025-08] The Tribune interview on pushing Israel to allow more aid into Gaza; a Facebook source of the story, not yet confirmed.
  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-18] His letter to Egypt, retrieved and verified for the record. Not on the card summary.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Reaction window, 2023-10-09] His statement, and [Reaction window, 2023-11-18] his KPCW remarks. Neither is on the card summary.
  • [Context, 2020-12] The JNS interview, verified: alliance framing and boycott-movement opposition.
  • [Iran] His April 2024 release repeats his criticism of U.S. Iran diplomacy; Iran material, research page only.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • Tracked AIPAC and RJC support appears as badges on this card.

Safety and antisemitism

  • [Action, 2024-12-19] The leadership campus-antisemitism report, verified via the Jerusalem Post naming him as co-releasing vice chair.
  • [Reported, 2024-05-10] The CBP-investigation letter; his release page could not be retrieved, reported, not confirmed directly with his quoted influx-of-threats line unused.
  • [Reported, 2024] His University Accountability Act support quote, per the Malliotakis release and Jerusalem Post; reported, not confirmed directly.

Race and status context

  • Sitting member, nominated in the redrawn district. His Democratic challenger’s card carries its own record.

Also in this race

  1. – Peter Crosby (Democrat)
  2. – Daniel Cottam (Libertarian)
  3. – Carlton E. Bowen (Other)
  4. – Robert M. Moesinger (Other)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.