But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

John Duresky

Democrat · U.S. House, Washington District 4
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: An April 2026 newsletter article says he "has pledged not to take any money from AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee)" or corporate lobbies, without saying where he stands on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Duresky has pledged not to take any money from AIPAC or corporate lobbies, and is endorsed by the "Stop arming Israel" and "Track AIPAC" voting groups. Statements attributed to him calling Gaza an "ongoing genocide" and opposing military aid are on the research page, not yet confirmed.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Duresky, a retired Air Force major, is the Democratic challenger in Washington’s 4th District, a heavily Republican seat.

His verified record: an April 2026 interview feature confirms he "has pledged not to take any money from AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) or corporate lobbies", an organization-specific pledge in a reform-focused platform; and Ballotpedia’s endorsement tracker lists him as endorsed by the "Stop arming Israel" voting group founded by Tariq Habash, "Track AIPAC", and "Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption".

The research’s stronger material, a March 2026 "No AIPAC Money!" campaign video, Facebook comments describing Gaza as an "ongoing genocide", support for ending military aid and weapons transfers to Israel, and a remark that "Harris lost my vote primarily because of her stance on Israel", is carried entirely on his own campaign Facebook page and an ActBlue fundraising page; those await a human check until verified. The endorsements and the pledge, both verified, point the same direction.

Nothing located has him addressing antisemitism or aid to Palestinians as policy. Ask Duresky directly and send us the reply: it goes on this page in his own words.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.
✓ Endorsed by Track AIPAC
Track AIPACA watchdog on AIPAC-linked money. It backs candidates who reject AIPAC support and call for an arms embargo and conditions on aid to the government of Israel.These endorsements come from groups that push to restrict or end U.S. weapons transfers to the government of Israel. Endorsements from these groups are shown for information; they do not decide the mark.

In their words

Endorsements

Track AIPAC (2026 endorsement)

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

U.S. aid to Palestinians

  • Nothing located as policy at any date.

Characterization of the conflict

  • [Held for human verification, 2026-03-25] The ongoing-genocide description and domestic-costs framing; own-Facebook sources.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

  • [Verified, 2026-04-05] The interview feature confirming the AIPAC-money pledge, quoted on the card.
  • [Verified] The Track AIPAC and Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption endorsements per Ballotpedia; the joint ActBlue fundraising page is marked uncorroborated in the research.
  • No tracked committee support.

Safety and antisemitism

  • Nothing located at any date.

Race and status context

  • Democratic challenger in WA-4 against the Republican advancer from the top-two primary.

Also in this race

  1. ? Amanda McKinney (Republican)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.